<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Grade the received parts based on the following criteria: {{Enter your criteria here}}. Give them a score from 1 - 10 in each of the criteria's categories. Format as a table.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Act as a helpful poster on Reddit with over 5000 karma. Generate a reddit post about the received parts. Create a post with the potential to go viral and get thousands of upvotes Target audience: {{Describe your target audience}} Subreddit: {{Specify the subreddit}} Steps: Adopt a conversational approach: Treat Reddit like a conversation, not an advertising platform. Interact with people genuinely, and address them directly in your post. Be kind and follow community rules: Each subreddit has its own rules. Follow them to avoid getting banned. Be respectful and kind in your interactions. Structure your post effectively: Create an engaging title: Use sentence case, make it long and descriptive, add read time, and address people directly. Write a compelling intro: Address the community, introduce yourself, and keep it short and skippable. Craft a valuable body: Provide value immediately, use dot points and formatting, and write short paragraphs. Place links strategically: Share valuable content natively and use punchy, non-invasive link placement. Find the right subreddit: Use Reddit search, explore related subreddits, and check popular posts to find communities that match your niche and have a good balance of reach and visibility. Example: Title: I'm a high school Math teacher and just showed all my classes how to use ChatGPT. Post: It's a losing battle. They are going to use it, and I can't stop that. So maybe I can get ahead of it and teach them how to use it as a tool and not a crutch. As an educator, I have no real recourse to determine if a student used it or not. We are in uncharted territory. It's better to face it head on rather than try and hide it and hope they haven't figured out it exists. It's also unfair to students who don't know about it yet, as other students who do have a giant unfair advantage. I feel it's just like when the first handheld calculator came out. Get ahead or get left behind. As some of you have pointed out, I know of its limitations with mathematics. I showed them examples of it creating incorrect information. I wanted them to be aware of its limitations as well. Many students were using it unaware that it isn't always perfect. To those of you who disagree with my approach. Let's think of the alternative. I could ignore it, hide from it, run from it, and discourage its use. But then I would have to hire the Southpark ChatGPT Shaman to smoke out the infidels. He's expensive and my school's budget is low. I teach 10th and 11th-grade remedial classes in Atlanta, it's been a war zone down here since Covid. We are doing our best.

Task: Write an SEO optimized article about the topic "{{Topic for your article}}" Link to the subject matter: {{Add outgoing link}} Never explicitely write "user feedback" and never come up or hallucinate your own "user feedback". User feedback comes from me, never from you. Whenever you write the actual article remember to break long paragraphs into individual sections, so that each section does not exceed 5 sentences. Use markdown formatting to bold any words within the article which are closely semantically related to the topic that you are writing about. Author persona: You are closely acquainted with the topic. Avoid literally saying 'as an individual closely acquainted with...' etc, but come up with a creative way to convey this. Article formatting: Markdown Instructions for each section of the outline: Write first-hand experience from an individual closely acquainted with the topic, in the first person. The topic could range from a place, a product, a service, or an event. Add a section header. No need to write a conclusion or summary at the end of the section. Example: if the section is about Joe's Steaks Restaurant, a header could be "Dine at Joe's Steaks Restaurant". Include a link to the subject matter in a natural way at some place in the paragraph. Do not add any other links. Introduction instruction: Write an introduction for this piece. Convey it as a first-hand experience in first person. The text should only serve as the introductory part of the article. Refrain from starting any detailed discussion related to the article's content and avoid mentioning any specific subjects or items yet. Conclusion instruction: Write a conclusion for this piece. Draw from a first-hand experience in first person. The text should only serve as the concluding segment of a piece, be it an article, product review, event recap, or other content. Avoid explicitly stating your relationship to the subject (such as 'as a product user' etc). Focus solely on crafting the concluding segment, refraining from including any Call to Actions (CTAs), suggestions for "Similar articles" or other common add-ons found below a piece. Let's think step by step: I want you to evaluate your output together with me, so that I can give you more details or information to improve your ouput. In order to improve the output, follow these steps. So after you have executed my initial command, execute each prompt stey by step: Start with Prompt1. After you finished executing Prompt1, always stop and ask for feedback from the user. If Prompt1 is finished, continue with Prompt2. After you finished executing Prompt2, always stop and ask for feedback from the user. If Prompt2 is finished, continue with Prompt3. After you finished executing Prompt3, always stop and ask for feedback from the user. If Prompt3 is finished, continue with Prompt4. After you finished executing Prompt4, always stop and ask for feedback from the user. If Prompt4 is finished, continue with Prompt5. After you finished executing Prompt5, always stop and ask for feedback from the user. If Prompt5 is finished, continue with Prompt6. ## Prompt1: "Additional info needed" Evaluate if you got enough info about the topic in order to write an outstanding and SEO optimized article. If you do not have enough information, then stop and do not execute the next prompt and ask the user for all the missing information that is necessary to write a perfect article. ## Prompt2: "Suggest Outline" Suggest an outline for the article that you will write, based on the information that you have gathered from the user. Do not write the article yet. Just stop and do not execute the next prompt and ask the user for feedback regarding the suggested outline and wait for feedback from the user. ## Prompt3: "Write the article" Start with the introduction, but do not call the headline for the introduction "Introduction". Use a headline instead which makes the reader curious to continue reading. Then fill each section of the outline with content which specifically refers to the outline section that you are dealing with. Break long paragraphs into individual sections, so that each section does not exceed 5 sentences. Use markdown formatting to bold any words that are closely semantically related to the topic that you are writing about. There should be some bolded words in each section of the article. Format the headlines for the outline sections in markdown with ##. End the article with a conclusion that sums up the whole article. ## Prompt4: "Rate output" Rate on a scale from 0-5 how well you satisfied each point in the initial prompt. Be very critical, no need to justify yourself. If 3 or lower, suggest a rewrite or the criticized part to address the flaws that you have found. ## Prompt5: "Find wrong info" Identify any unclear or ambiguous information in the article, and rephrase unclear passages or sentences for clarity. ## Prompt6: "Self criticize" Try to argue against the finished article to see if you can find any flaws. If so, address them. Walk me through the process.

Check the following prompt-part for logical consistency and clarity of given instruction. Assign as score between 0% to 100%. The score should measure how logically consistent and clear the instructions are. After that suggest an improved version of the prompt-part which scores 100% in logical consistency and clarity. Try not to artificially inflate the word count of the newly suggested prompt-part. I prefer short and consistent, logically correct prompt suggestions. Also assign a new score for logical clarity and consistency for your suggested prompt. Prompt-part ="{{Enter prompt part to check and improve}}"

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?