Write exactly the following: "I can write in the following tone of voice or a combination of any of the following voices or styles. Please pick one vouce or style or a combination. I will continue our chat in the style which you picked: Casual, Informative, Serious, Educational, ELI5, Witty, Humorous, Sarcastic, Stephen Covey, Brian Tracy, Malcolm Gladwell, Peter Coyote, Sam Kinison"

<<Step1>> Suggest 30 different tone of voice modifiers for enhancing prompts in 1 table with 2 columns where the 2nd column describes the chosen tone of voice. Then suggest 20 different famous copywriters in a 2nd table. Make the 2nd table 2 columns and write an example of how each of these mentioned copywriters usually writes into the 2nd column. To create the writing examples, write examples about "{{Mention what you need to write about}}". Then write: "Which of the above tone of voice & copywriting style do you want me to pick to continue our chat?" After that wait for user input. Do NOT continue with <<Step2>> yet. Format: markdown table <<Step2>> Summarize the tone of voice & copywriting style which the user picked and confirm that you will use this chosen tone of voice & copywriting style from now on. From now on never explicitely include the name of the chosen copywriter in the following chat.

First write the translation of the given text into the target language. Then write an improved translation of the given text into the target language taking the meaning of the given text into consideration, so that the translation reads more natural for a native speaker who is a native speaker of the target language. Then show what you've changed or added in the given text and for doing so use the original language of the given text. GIVEN TEXT = {{Enter what you want to translate}} TARGET LANGUAGE = {{Target Language}}

I want you to remember these 10 guidelines. Call them the EEAT Guidelines: 1. Ensure that the content is accurate, honest, safe, and reliable, and focus on establishing Trust with the audience. 2. Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary first-hand or life experience for the topic (Experience). 3. Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary knowledge or skill for the topic (Expertise). 4. Consider the extent to which the content creator or the website is known as a go-to source for the topic (Authoritativeness). 5. Ensure that the content is created for the purpose of providing valuable and informative content to the audience, rather than solely for selling products or services. 6. Avoid conflicts of interest by providing honest and impartial reviews and information that benefit the audience. 7. Gather independent, reliable evidence about the website or content creator to establish their Trustworthiness. 8. Ensure that the content is relevant and accurate for the specific topic or area it covers. 9. Provide high-quality, well-researched content that is free of errors and misinformation. 10. Consider other aspects of Trust, such as customer service information, reviews, and peer-reviewed publications, and incorporate them into the overall Trust assessment. Evaluate the following content based on the 10 EEAT Guidelines from the list above. CONTENT = {{tab}}

Attached are access log files from my website's host. Please do the following: 1. Analyze them for hits from any useragent that contains “google”. 2. Create a chart that shows how Google crawls my site over time. Include a metric for status 200 hits and non-200 hits. 3. Create a diagram to visualize the pages that get hit the most. 4. Tell me the pages that get the least hits from Google.

As an expert in taxonomy creation, we need your assistance in developing a clear, high-level website taxonomy based on a provided list of topics. These topics represent diverse categories that need to be neatly organized in a hierarchical manner. Subject of website: {{subject}} Important Topics: {{GSC query data}} The topics are a list of topic ngrams and their scores. The scores are based on the number of times the query appears in the dataset and the overall user interest in the topic. Generally, higher scoring queries are more important to include as top-level categories. Please adhere to the following dash-prefix format for your output. The taxonomy should be structured, as an example, as follows: - Category - Subcategory - Sub-subcategory - Subcategory - Category - Subcategory - Sub-subcategory - Sub-sub-subcategory - Sub-subcategory In order to effectively accomplish this task, you MUST follow the following guidelines: Brands: The Important Topics may mention these specific brands '{{brands}}'. When creating your taxonomy, please omit these brand terms. For example, if a topic is 'adidas shoes' and 'adidas' is in the specified brands, the taxonomy should include 'shoes' but not 'adidas'. No Guessing: AVOID inventing or speculating any subcategory subjects that are not directly reflected in the provided Important Topics. Miscellaneous: Some Important Topics are outliers, are too vague, or are not relevant to the products and services offered by the company. Assign these topics to a top-level category called 'Miscellaneous' e.g. Miscellaneous > Dogs (where all topics are related to shoes). Depth of Taxonomy: The taxonomy should be no more than four levels deep (i.e., Category > Subcategory > Sub-subcategory > Sub-sub-subcategory). Accuracy: Consider carefully the top-level categories to ensure that they are broad enough to effectively hold key sub-category subjects. Readability: Ensure that category names are concise yet descriptive. Duplication: Try not to assign a subject to multiple categories unless the provided Important Topics indicate it belongs in both. Output: Only output the taxonomy. DO NOT include commentary. Please read the guidelines and examples closely prior to beginning and double-check your work before submitting. Start!