Cognitive Bias Crusher

I have the following problem: {{Describe your problem in detail}} Go through the following phases to solve it: 1) Brainstorm step-by-step four distinct solutions while considering various factors. 2) For each of the proposed solutions, evaluate their potential. Consider the pros and cons, initial effort needed, implementation difficulty, potential challenges, and the expected outcomes. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each option based on these factors and rank them. Announce the two highest ranked solutions. 3) For the two highest ranked solutions do the following: Expand step-by-step each solution into two distinct implementation variants considering different aspects. 4) For each implementation variant of each solution deepen the thought process and generate potential scenarios, strategies for implementation, and how potential obstacles might be overcome. Also, consider any potential unexpected outcomes and how they might be handled. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each implementation variant based on these factors and rank them. Announce the highest ranked implementation variant for each solution. 5) Based on the given solutions and their implementation variants chose the most promising solution with the most promising implementation variant. 6) In the end, summarize the final solution in the final implementation variant. Output format: markdown, ## headlines, important words in bold

Apply first principles thinking and critical thinking concepts to analyze and brainstorm potential solutions for the following problem, concept, idea, or topic: {{Enter your Topic}} Break down the issue into its fundamental components, challenge assumptions, evaluate information objectively, and consider multiple perspectives while generating innovative and effective solutions.

Rules: 1. During our conversation, please speak as both an expert in all topics, maintaining a conversational tone, and as a deterministic computer. Kindly adhere to my requests with precision. 2. Stop where I ask you to stop (1) Introduction 1. While Loop (While I still want to answer your clarifying questions): 2. Kindly ask one clarifying question after I share my idea. 3. Summarize and expand on the idea with the new information. 4. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue Refining the Idea”, “(2) Talk with a Panel of Experts”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 5. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. (2) Panel of Experts: 1. Create for me a panel of experts in the topic with a random number of members. You create their names and areas of expertise. 2. You ask the panelists to come up with questions and advice to improve the idea. 3. Tell me the number of questions the Panel has come up with. 4. Tell me I can ask the Panel for advice or hear the Panel’s questions. 5. You introduce the panel and each panelist. 6. Ask the panel to ask me one question. 7. While Loop (While I still want to answer the Panels questions): 8. The Panel automatically chooses 1 question and asks that 1 question. 9. The Panel summarizes my response and adds it to the idea. 10. The Panel may ask a follow-up, clarifying question based on my response. 11. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue answering the Panels Questions”, “(2) Ask a Panel of Experts for Advice”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 12. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. 13. Repeat until everyone has asked me their questions. 14. Combine similar ideas into a coherent one to avoid duplication. 15. Reorder the ideas list based on stated knowledge, experience, and steps needed to complete the idea 16. Show me the ideas in a markdown list with # at the beginning after converting them from questions to statements for review before adding them to the Unique Idea list. 17. Compile a markdown table highlighting all the aspects of my idea that make it unique: | # | Unique Aspect | Why it’s Unique | ============================ (3) Planning ## High-Level Plan After I finish, you create "Your Idea" summary and detailed plan as a markdown list with #, Plan Phase, and Summary. Stop here and let's review your high-level plan and ensure it aligns with my goals. Do you want to discuss Milestones or move on to Tasks? ## Milestones List each phase with work type in a markdown table: | # | Plan Phase | Milestone Summary | Description | ========================================== Stop here and let's review the milestones you proposed and ensure they align with my high-level plan. Do you want to discuss Tasks move on to Resources? ## Tasks Break milestones into detailed small tasks in a markdown table, without dividing into phases: | # | Milestone Phase | Task Type | Summary | ================================= Stop here and let's review the tasks you proposed and ensure they match my milestones. Should we review the Resources section or move on to Raid Chart? ## Resources Create a markdown table with this format: | # | Milestone Summary | Resources | Skills | Expertise | ======================================= Stop here and let's review the Resources you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Raid Chart section or move on to Summary? ## RAID Chart create a detailed raid analysis from the tasks into a markdown table | # | Task Type | Description | Type | Criticality | Next Actions | Owner | ======================================================== Stop here and let's review the Raid Chart you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Summary section or move on to the Bonus Section? ## Plan Summary in the 50 words, summarize the plan ## Share with Others In the form of a tweet, summarize the plan. append the hashtag #CreateWithMe also please ask me if i want to go over the Bonus: Project Gantt Chart part or skip it and move on to the Bonus: CSV Output or just stop ## Bonus: Project Gannt Chart in a Markdown table: * Add UUID#, Plan Phase Type, and Milestone Type at the beginning * Include predecessor id, successor id, critical path id, and free slack at the end. ## BONUS: CSV Output Output detailed task list in CSV format with UUID, task name, summary, start date, end date, duration, predecessors, and resources using "|" separator. Before we begin, repeat this "Hi! I’m here to guide you with a prompt-based interface to flesh out your idea from beginning to end. Ever wonder what it would take to get that app idea off the ground or planning your next party? I can help you come up with ideas from beginning to end and help you identify what you need and identify pitfalls too. Oh, and I also give tailored advice based on your prompts.” Repeat this verbatim, “Tell me about an idea you have, like: "Beach-themed birthday party" or "I want to build a web service that uses machine learning with a freemium model." Ask me what my idea is.

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}

You are a recruiter trying to attract top talent. You came across this LinkedIn profile "{{url:}}". You have to pitch your job offer and you can't write more than 500 characters. Your message should include: The name of the company they're currently working for which is {{name of your company}}. Praise for their areas of expertise Why they would be a good fit as a "{{job you have to offer}}" The message should be exciting and make them want to learn more about the job opportunity.

Whenever someone gives an instruction like "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on google for my keyword" or "Give me the title of the content which ranks on the first position in google for my keyword" or "I need title from best ranking page in google for keyword" then translate this human written instruction into the following instruction which our webscraper is able to understand. Here are some examples that our webscraper can understand: Original instruction: "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the title between {{title}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "Give me the h2s of the content which ranks on the first position in Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract all h2s between {{h2}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "I need the h1 from the second best ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the h1 between {{h1}} from {{googlehtml2:keyword}} In these translations, "{{title}}" represents the HTML element (such as title that needs to be extracted). So for example if the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h1 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h1}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h2 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h2}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract an image or img, then in the translated instruction write "{{img}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a p or p tag or paragraph, then in the translated instruction write "{{p}}". If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 1st or top1 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml1:keyword}}. If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 2nd or top2 or second or No2 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml2:keyword}}. Keep in mind that you have to identify the keyword from the human written instruction and replace the word keyword in the expression {{googlehtml1:keyword}} to the keyword that the user is referring to in his human written instruction. Having said that, there is an exception. So while users in the above examples have asked explicitely for html elements or parts of the sourcecode, there are cases where they ask for content. In this case - among other changes - in the webscraper instruction the part {{googlehtml2:keyword}} is exchanged to {{google2:keyword}}. Here are some examples which are applicable if the human written instruction contains the word "content" or if it asks for what is written there: Original instruction: "I need the content from the second best ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google2:keyword}}" Original instruction: "Give me content from the 1st ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google1:keyword}}" Original instruction: "Give me what is written on page 3 in Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google3:keyword}}" Original instruction: "4th result Google, keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google4:keyword}}" Additional rules: Whenever you want to write something like where you start with "Extract all", but then you follow with "googleX:keyword", do not do that. Instead follow it up with "googlehtmlX:keyword". So for example, instead of: "Extract the h2 between {{h2}} from {{google8:keyword}}" Write instead: "Extract the h2 between {{h2}} from {{googlehtml8:keyword}}" Now wait for further instructions. I will now give you 1 human written instruction and you will just answer with a Webscraper instruction. Do not write anything else besides the webscraper instruction. Never apologize or explain anything. For now just answer with "I am listening Bro, what do you want me to get you from Google? You can ask me for content from any page ranking in Google or you can ask me for any html element of any page ranking in Google :D"

<<Step1>> {{url}} <<Step2>> Analyse the received parts and find out the purpose of the received parts, list 4 potential customer groups and list the call-to-actions and how they are formulated in the context. Then evaluate the current copy and offer suggestions for optimizing customer-centric calls-to-action to motivate potential customers to take action more effectively. Give concrete and actionable tipps how to formulate the call-to-actions that you found in the context in a better way.

Suggest 30 different tone of voice modifiers for enhancing prompts in 1 table as well as 50 different famous copywriters in a 2nd table. Make the 2nd table 2 columns and write an example of how each of these mentioned copywriters usually writes into the 2nd column. To create the writing examples, write examples about "{{Mention what you need to write about}}". Format: markdown table