Case Study From URL

Write a clear, motivational and urgent elevator pitch using the PAS copy-writing framework for my product or business: {{describe your product or business}}. My product or business solves the problem: {{describe which problem your product or business solves}}. Write less than {{how many words}} words. Do not use the words Problem, Agitation or Solution in your answer.

Write a clear, motivational and urgent elevator pitch using the AIDA copywriting framework for the product or business: {{describe your product or business}}. The product or business solves the problem: {{describe what problem your product or business solves}}. Write less than {{how many words}} words. Do not use the words Attention, Interest, Desire or Action in your answer.

Write a creative, catchy, and convincing call to action for the product or business: {{describe your product or business}}. Write less than {{how many words}} words.

Write a detailed local service description with call-to-action for the service {{name your service}} in {{location}} with the name "{{name of your business}}" and include the keywords {{some keywords you want to use}}. People can reach the service by using the phone number {{your phone number}} or going to the website {{your website}}.

Write a click-worthy and motivational headline with a CTA for the topic {{describe your topic}}

Take the following product: "{{describe what your product does}}", then generate a list of 6 reasonable features that this product could have. For each feature list reasonable benefits. Then name emotions that users of the product could connect to each benefit. After this write a convincing sales-copy which clearly lists the main benefits of each feature and describes the emotion which is triggered in the user of the product when using the product.

Consider possible objections to the following product or service: {{Describe your product or service}} and give step-by-step instructions on how to answer those objections in a way that will make customers like the given product or service.

Hime is an AI that only generates a very detailed, realistic, super expanded mind map in the Markmap format about the following topic: {{Enter a topic}}. The mind map which consists of words that are semantically related to the topic must be organized hierarchically, visually appealing, must not be in long sentences, and expand the generation by 50 times before presenting it. Respond in markdown format and put the response inside a markdown block. Don't ask or talk about anything else. Don't give instructions.

Take the following product: "{{describe what your product does}}", then generate a list of 6 reasonable features that this product could have. For each feature list reasonable benefits. Then name emotions that users of the product could connect to each benefit. After this write a convincing sales-copy which clearly lists the main benefits of each feature and describes the emotion which is triggered in the user of the product when using the product.

You are an assistant helping to write an essay. Use this format, replacing text in brackets with the result. Do not include the brackets in the output: Essay in [Identified language of the topic]: # [Essay title] [Introduction paragraph] ## [Name of topic 1] [Paragraph about topic 1] ## [Name of topic 2] [Paragraph about topic 2] ## [Name of topic 3] [Paragraph about topic 3] ## ['Conclusion', in the identified language of the topic] [Conclusion paragraph]

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?

I want you to become my Expert Prompt Creator. Your goal is to help me craft the best possible prompt for my needs. The prompt you provide should be written from the perspective of me making the request to ChatGPT. Consider in your prompt creation that this prompt will be entered into an interface for GPT3, GPT4, or ChatGPT. The prompt will include instructions to write the output using my communication style. The process is as follows: 1. You will generate the following sections: " **Prompt:** >{provide the best possible prompt according to my request} {summarize my prior messages to you and provide them as examples of my communication style} **Critique:** {provide a concise paragraph on how to improve the prompt. Be very critical in your response. This section is intended to force constructive criticism even when the prompt is acceptable. Any assumptions and or issues should be included} **Questions:** {ask any questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt (max of 3). If the prompt needs more clarification or details in certain areas, ask questions to get more information to include in the prompt} " 2. I will provide my answers to your response which you will then incorporate into your next response using the same format. We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt until the prompt is perfected. Remember, the prompt we are creating should be written from the perspective of Me (the user) making a request to you, ChatGPT (a GPT3/GPT4 interface). An example prompt you could create would start with "You will act as an expert physicist to help me understand the nature of the universe". Think carefully and use your imagination to create an amazing prompt for me. Your first response should only be a greeting and to ask what the prompt should be about.