Language Style Improver

I want you to act as an English translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in English. I want you to replace my simplified A0-level words and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level English words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

Explain in detail the type I of the DISC framework and the strengths and weaknesses of an I type personality. Explain how a person can find out if he or she is a I type personality by giving concrete examples of typical I type behavior both in a work environment as well as at home. Also explain the sub-types ID and IS with their strengths and weaknesses and give concrete examples of typical behavior that make it easy for someone to recognize if he or she is really an I or ID or IS personality. Also give tips how an I type personality can compensate for his or her weaknesses and how an I type personality should communicate with workmates that belong to different types like C, S or D.

Always write your text in markdown format. Here is a quick reminder of markdown formatting: **bold** _italic_ #headline ##subheadline '''inline codeblock''' (backticks on each side) codeblock (3 backticks at top and bottom) ~~strikethrough~~ [Link text] (https://www.example.com) MYKEYWORD = {{Keyword}} First write a list of 15 words or word combinations which are semantically related to mykeyword. Then write a text about mykeyword. Use 1 #headline, multiple ##headlines and sometimes headlines if it makes sense. Bold important words which are semantically related to mykeyword or to any of the words from the list of semantically related words, use italic where it makes sense. Remember to write these semantically related words always in bold, even if the related words are written in a different way, e.g. in the singular or plural form or if they are expressed using different words or combination of different words. You have to use bold as long as the words are closely semanticaly related to any of the related words or to mykeyword. Start the article with a very short, but capitivating introduction why it makes sense to read the article. Write the introduction in a way that it matches the intent of someone who searches for mykeyword in Google, but do not write the word "introduction" as part of the introduction headline. Use a more attention grabing headline instead which matches the intent of mykeyword. End the article with a short summary and a conclusion. Write about {{Write how many word you want to get}} words. Write the article in {{target language}}.

Generate hreflang tags for your website. Your website URL is {{url:}}. The X-default version is English. The German version is {{url:}}. The French version is {{url:}}. Include the links to both the German and French versions, along with the corresponding language and localization information.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Act as a helpful poster on Reddit with over 5000 karma. Generate a reddit post about the received parts. Create a post with the potential to go viral and get thousands of upvotes Target audience: {{Describe your target audience}} Subreddit: {{Specify the subreddit}} Steps: Adopt a conversational approach: Treat Reddit like a conversation, not an advertising platform. Interact with people genuinely, and address them directly in your post. Be kind and follow community rules: Each subreddit has its own rules. Follow them to avoid getting banned. Be respectful and kind in your interactions. Structure your post effectively: Create an engaging title: Use sentence case, make it long and descriptive, add read time, and address people directly. Write a compelling intro: Address the community, introduce yourself, and keep it short and skippable. Craft a valuable body: Provide value immediately, use dot points and formatting, and write short paragraphs. Place links strategically: Share valuable content natively and use punchy, non-invasive link placement. Find the right subreddit: Use Reddit search, explore related subreddits, and check popular posts to find communities that match your niche and have a good balance of reach and visibility. Example: Title: I'm a high school Math teacher and just showed all my classes how to use ChatGPT. Post: It's a losing battle. They are going to use it, and I can't stop that. So maybe I can get ahead of it and teach them how to use it as a tool and not a crutch. As an educator, I have no real recourse to determine if a student used it or not. We are in uncharted territory. It's better to face it head on rather than try and hide it and hope they haven't figured out it exists. It's also unfair to students who don't know about it yet, as other students who do have a giant unfair advantage. I feel it's just like when the first handheld calculator came out. Get ahead or get left behind. As some of you have pointed out, I know of its limitations with mathematics. I showed them examples of it creating incorrect information. I wanted them to be aware of its limitations as well. Many students were using it unaware that it isn't always perfect. To those of you who disagree with my approach. Let's think of the alternative. I could ignore it, hide from it, run from it, and discourage its use. But then I would have to hire the Southpark ChatGPT Shaman to smoke out the infidels. He's expensive and my school's budget is low. I teach 10th and 11th-grade remedial classes in Atlanta, it's been a war zone down here since Covid. We are doing our best.