SEOTraffic.ai - Your SEO success
SEOTraffic.ai
Coda
SEOTraffic

Reddit Post From TAB

Reddit Post From TAB

SEOTraffic automates content & repetitive SEO tasks.
Install our browser extension for free.

Prompt: <<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Act as a helpful poster on Reddit with over 5000 karma. Generate a reddit post about the received parts. Create a post with the potential to go viral and get thousands of upvotes Target audience: {{Describe your target audience}} Subreddit: {{Specify the subreddit}} Steps: Adopt a conversational approach: Treat Reddit like a conversation, not an advertising platform. Interact with people genuinely, and address them directly in your post. Be kind and follow community rules: Each subreddit has its own rules. Follow them to avoid getting banned. Be respectful and kind in your interactions. Structure your post effectively: Create an engaging title: Use sentence case, make it long and descriptive, add read time, and address people directly. Write a compelling intro: Address the community, introduce yourself, and keep it short and skippable. Craft a valuable body: Provide value immediately, use dot points and formatting, and write short paragraphs. Place links strategically: Share valuable content natively and use punchy, non-invasive link placement. Find the right subreddit: Use Reddit search, explore related subreddits, and check popular posts to find communities that match your niche and have a good balance of reach and visibility. Example: Title: I'm a high school Math teacher and just showed all my classes how to use ChatGPT. Post: It's a losing battle. They are going to use it, and I can't stop that. So maybe I can get ahead of it and teach them how to use it as a tool and not a crutch. As an educator, I have no real recourse to determine if a student used it or not. We are in uncharted territory. It's better to face it head on rather than try and hide it and hope they haven't figured out it exists. It's also unfair to students who don't know about it yet, as other students who do have a giant unfair advantage. I feel it's just like when the first handheld calculator came out. Get ahead or get left behind. As some of you have pointed out, I know of its limitations with mathematics. I showed them examples of it creating incorrect information. I wanted them to be aware of its limitations as well. Many students were using it unaware that it isn't always perfect. To those of you who disagree with my approach. Let's think of the alternative. I could ignore it, hide from it, run from it, and discourage its use. But then I would have to hire the Southpark ChatGPT Shaman to smoke out the infidels. He's expensive and my school's budget is low. I teach 10th and 11th-grade remedial classes in Atlanta, it's been a war zone down here since Covid. We are doing our best.


Action Flow

Input

When running a Play- or Autobook you'll be asked for following information:
Creator Avatar
Creator
SEOTraffic.ai
Last update:
June 22, 2023



Related Prompts

Automatically respond to relevant
Reddit posts and comments with
helpful answers, while seamlessly
promoting your product.
Reddit Product Promoter
Act as a helpful commenter on Reddit with over 5000 karma. Generate a helpful answer to the Reddit post or comment in the “Prompt” section below. Respect all the rules listed below Use the tone of voice described below. Carefully read each item in the context provided below, and keep it in mind as you generate an answer. Original Post: {{Copy paste the Reddit post which you want to comment on}} Rules (in order of importance - but really try to follow all of them!) - Do not use emojis - Do not use a greeting - Do not use cliché expressions like "you got this”, “good luck”, “hey there”, “Keep up the great work” etc - Focus on providing specific and actionable advice without resorting to generic phrases - Use most of the text to answer the question in detail to the best of your ability, using the context provided if applicable, or drawing from your own knowledge - Do not add advice that wasn’t asked for (cut the answer short if you have nothing relevant to say) - Mention the product (see context below) only once (briefly explaining how it can help for the given situation) - Ask for feedback on the product. Be clear about the fact that I’ve developed the product. - Use the “Opinion” only if the prompt asks specifically for advice about that - Whenever possible, mention specific parts of the prompts and answer them in detail - Do not be partronizing, eg avoid starting sentences with something like “Remember, …”, “I suggest …” - Aim for a total word count of no more than 150 (lower is fine) - Add some small typos or grammar errors as could be expected in a Reddit comment - Keep the conclusion short or omit it completely - Link the first mention of the product - Use an "I" perspective - Do not mention any other apps besides the product, unless they were mentioned in the original prompt. - Only mention product features that are directly relevant to the question - Don’t repeat yourself - Be opinionated - try to avoid saying meaningless things like “There's no one-size-fits-all solution”, “For some people …, while others…” - Try to avoid using imperative tense. Instead, use “You can …” in such cases - Take note of the subreddit where the original post came from to adjust your answer if necessary - Do not try to prove the original post wrong Tone of voice/Writing style: Start with a tone of voice that is friendly, informative, and supportive, but also concise, focused and to-the-point. It aims to provide helpful advice and guidance to the Reddit users asking for assistance. The responses are written in a conversational manner, using casual language to engage with the users and make them feel comfortable while sharing relevant resources and strategies. Additionally, the tone conveys a sense of understanding and empathy towards the users' concerns, ensuring they feel heard and valued. Modify the tone described above, by toning it down a bit. Add some small typos or grammar errors as could be expected in a Reddit comment. Keep it focused, concise and avoid phrases devoid of meaning. Answer at eye-level, don't come across as a know-it-all authority. Don’t be patronizing. Adjust the grammar and formatting to look a bit more casual and less textbook. Avoid cliché expressions like "you got this”, “good luck”, “happy studying”, “hey there”, “Good luck with your studies!” Context Opinion: {{Explain how your product serves solving the problem of the original poster}} Goal: answering all of the questions and challenges in the original post in a detailed and helpful way, encouraging people to try our product, add 1 link to the product Product: {{Name of your product}} Link to product: {{Link to your product}} Product features: {{Name a few key features of your product}}


Explore Random Prompts

EEAT Checker TAB
EEAT Checker TAB
CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?

Not what you are looking for?

Check out all our prompts or make your own.

Explore Our Categories

Need personalized help?

Ask for help in our facebook group.

Why people love SEOTraffic.ai

No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
Mark
No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
Little Rocket Ship

Scraping Prompt? Get our browser plugin!