Entities table

Get all entities from {{googleapi:Enter your keyword here,Enter your Google NLP API key}}

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Extract all the entities from the received parts. Then provide a list of synonyms for each of those entities. Then list the above entities in a table. In the first column, list the entities. In the second column, list related concepts to each entity. Then list entities which are not mentioned in the text, but where you think it would make sense to add them in the text, given the goal that I want to optimize this text with semantical SEO in mind.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Extract all keywords and entities from the received parts. Keywords can be 1-grams, 2-grams, 3-grams or 4-grams. Then create a table in markdown format. Enter all 1-grams into the first column of the table. Then enter all 2-grams into the second column of the table. Fill the 3rd column with 3-grams and the 4th column with 4-grams. Then make another markdown table and enter all found entities there. Output format: markdown

Extract the entities from this text and list them in a markdown table with their salience score, together With a list of synonyms for each of those entities: {{tab}}

INPUT = {focus} OUTPUT = {description} \n  {description} = {focusDetailed},%20{adjective1},%20{adjective2},%20{visualStyle1},%20{visualStyle2},%20{visualStyle3},%20{artistReference} INPUT = a photo of a cat OUTPUT = A photo of a cat on a couch, comfortable, cute, colourful, interior design, Ansel Adams  INPUT = Fox with a cloak OUTPUT = A fox wearing a cloak, cinematic, heroic, professional photography, 4k, photo realistic, Tim Burton  INPUT = {{Describe your image}}

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Rewrite the received parts, but include the terms "{{Enter comma separated list of words to add}}" in {{How many words}} words. Output in markdown

Create 20 FAQ questions about: {{topic}}

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}