NLP Friendly Format

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Write a response to this question. {{Question}}. Start the first sentence by turning the question into a statement. Make the answers a bit longer and use common synonyms for the entities. Context to answer the question is in the received parts.

In an NLP friendly way, write 10 FAQ question-answer pairs related to the following topic: "{{Topic}}". Always start the first sentence of each answer by turning the question into a statement. Context to answer the question: {{tab}}

<<Step1>> {{google1}} <<Step2>> Extract all entities, semantically related keywords and all LSI keywords from the received parts.

<<Step1>> {{url}} <<Step2>> Write an email newsletter using the following framework, content, rules, and tone of voice. Be sure to end with a call to action (CTA) as described in the context section. Context: Target audience: {{Describe your target audience}} Newsletter Purpose: {{Describe the purpose of the newsletter}} Goals/CTA: {{Specify the goals and call to action}} Rules: Write from an "I" perspective. Tone of voice: The tone should be friendly, informative, and supportive. The tone should also be concise, focused, and to-the-point. The aim is to provide helpful advice and guidance. Use a conversational manner and casual language to engage with the users. Make the users feel comfortable while sharing relevant resources and strategies. Show understanding and empathy towards the users' concerns, ensuring they feel heard and valued. Content: Extract all information which is important for the newsletter from the received parts. Framework: Include valuable content such as blog posts, events, tips, or industry news. Structure your newsletter with 2 or more sections, a clear call to action, and eye-catching graphics. Keep the tone conversational and personalized, focusing on one main topic. Use a compelling subject line and informative preview text. Limit promotional content to 10% of the newsletter. Include contact and social information, as well as an unsubscribe option. Stay consistent with sending frequency and avoid overwhelming readers with too many calls to action or long content. Always consider your audience's needs and preferences, adjusting the tone and content accordingly.

Using WebPilot, please create an outline for an article that will be 1,500 words on the keyword "{{keyword}}", based on the top 10 results from Google. Please include every relevant heading possible. For each section of the outline, kindly include the word count. Additionally, include an FAQs section in the outline based on the "People Also Ask" section for the keyword. It is crucial that this outline is detailed and comprehensive, enabling me to create a thorough 1,500-word article from it. Furthermore, generate a long list of LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing) and NLP (Natural Language Processing) keywords that are related to my main keyword. Lastly, provide me with a list of 3 relevant external links to include in the article, along with the recommended anchor text. Please split the outline into part 1 and part 2. ---------- Follow-up Prompt: Once you have generated the outline, please respond with it. After I will approve the outline or instruct you to make changes to the outline, you need to write the article using markdown formatting and bullet points.

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}