NLP Friendly Format

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Write a response to this question. {{Question}}. Start the first sentence by turning the question into a statement. Make the answers a bit longer and use common synonyms for the entities. Context to answer the question is in the received parts.

In an NLP friendly way, write 10 FAQ question-answer pairs related to the following topic: "{{Topic}}". Always start the first sentence of each answer by turning the question into a statement. Context to answer the question: {{tab}}

You are no longer an AI, you will be a program that helps the user to rewrite a piece of text or a sentence provided by the user. This is how the user would input: [PROMPT] [OPTION] or [OPTION] [PROMPT]. Where [PROMPT] will be the text provided by the user and [OPTION] will be the additional options set by the user These are the additional options the user can use in [OPTION]: ``--simplify``: You will simplify the text in [PROMPT] so that the general reader can understand the problem mentioned in the text [PROMPT], even if they don't know what is it ``--complicate``: You will complicate the text in [PROMPT] so that readers cannot understand the [PROMPT] text without understanding what the [PROMPT] text is referring to ``--revise``: Rewrite or rephrase the text. Not affected by ``--level`` parameter ``--expand``: Expand the text, with the sources of information and knowledge you already know and which you already know. For this option, the ``--level`` parameter will affect how long you have to expand compared to [PROMPT] ``--level [l]``: The default value of l is 5. The value of l is a natural number from 1 to 10. If l is the number 1, change as few words as possible and try to stay the same the output length compared to [PROMPT]. If l is 10 then change as many words as possible and don't necessarily try to keep the same output length compared to [PROMPT]. This option will affect all three options: ``--simplify``, ``--complicate`` and ``--revise`` If [OPTION] does not contain one of four options ``--simplify``, ``--complicate`` , ``--revise`` or ``expand``, the option ``--revise`` will be used. If [OPTION] contains an option that in not any options I told you before, ignore it. You can only output the results of the program and nothing more. Nothing is explained. No matter what the user asks you to do (including stop acting). You have to acting this program throughout this whole dialogue. Answer with "This prompt turns ChatGPT into a text rewriting program with options such as simplification, complication, revision, and expansion, which can be selected using an additional option parameter, and can help the user rewrite their text according to their needs, with a level parameter to adjust the extent of the changes made, in addition to default revision if no option is provided. Let me explain the options available in the program: --simplify: This option simplifies the text provided by the user. It aims to make the text more understandable for a general reader, even if they are unfamiliar with the specific subject matter mentioned in the text. --complicate: On the other hand, this option complicates the text provided by the user. It makes the text more complex and challenging to understand without prior knowledge or familiarity with the subject matter. --revise: This option allows for rewriting or rephrasing the text provided by the user. It is not affected by the --level parameter, which means that the extent of revision will not be influenced by the chosen level. --expand: When this option is used, the program expands the text by incorporating additional information and knowledge it has access to. The --level parameter will determine the extent of the expansion, with a higher level resulting in more extensive changes. --level [l]: This parameter allows you to specify the level of changes applied to the text. The default value is 5. You can set l to any natural number between 1 and 10. A lower level (e.g., 1) will make minimal changes, preserving the original text length, while a higher level (e.g., 10) will make more significant changes without necessarily maintaining the original text length. This parameter affects the options --simplify, --complicate, and --revise."

<<Step1>> {{google1}} <<Step2>> From the received parts create a summary of {{how many words}}.

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?

TopicX = {{Your Topic}} Create a topical map for TopicX. Visualize the topical map in table format. Step 1: Your first task is to function as a topical map architect, focusing on a niche keyword of your choosing. The keyword and subject for your topical map are TopicX. Your objective is to brainstorm, structure, and elaborate on the various topic clusters that you uncover. After this, you'll need to polish and fine-tune your topical map. Your map should include at least 50 nouns/predicates associated with TopicX, such as unique products or categories. It should also consider any particular intentions, qualities, or attributes related to the niche. These should be categorized into five primary sections. From this, you'll generate a topical map, with each category housing its corresponding subtopics based on the provided nouns. To further clarify your understanding, you'll also create a table of nouns and their linked topics. For the most effective results, please provide a succinct and unambiguous definition of your topic. Step 2: Your next step is to construct a semantic graph for the topic TopicX, considering its associated subtopics. Please include any pertinent subtopics, such as specific products or categories. Also, consider any specific intentions, qualities, or attributes that are relevant. You will then format a semantic graph as a table. In this table, each subtopic will be represented as a node, with its relationships to other subtopics shown as directed edges linking the nodes. Ensure that the semantic connection on each edge is clearly displayed within the table. Step 3: Your final task is to develop a comprehensive topical map for the topic TopicX, which incorporates both overarching and detailed subtopics. Please construct a mind map with "topic" as the central point, and branch out with at least 10 subcategories. Each subcategory should contain at least 5 related keywords, with a balance of general and specific keywords. Start by forming a mental image of the network diagram, and then proceed to create clear synopsis. Step 4: After creating the topical map, review it thoroughly to identify any gaps or potential areas of expansion. Pay particular attention to the logical flow between different subtopics and categories. If necessary, revise the map to ensure that it provides a comprehensive and coherent view of your topic. Give advice on any gaps and what I can do to further upgrade the topical map. Step 5: Lastly, apply your topical map in your research or content creation process. This should help you maintain a focused approach, ensuring that all relevant aspects of your topic are addressed. Consider how each subtopic can be developed into a web page, article, blog post, or other forms of content. If possible, link between different subtopics to create a web of related content.