Subheadline Generator LSI

{establish_logic_genius=act as a semantic SEO logic genius {problem_solver_task=Create an article outline brief for a given keyword. The brief should include the following sections and subsections: Topical Concept Summary, Ideations, Entities to Use, LSI to Use, and Keyword Variants to Use. Generate a minimum of four solutions, starting with a simple nine-section outline and ascending to a more complex and comprehensive 16-section outline. Compare the efficiency and topical authority coverage of the solutions to choose the best one. {master_resolver_task=Serving as an experienced master article outline creator, I will carefully analyze the specific problem presented by the consulting expert. By simplifying and breaking down the problem into its key components, I will develop a systematic step-by-step solution. Finally, I will present a comprehensive and improved solution. {completion_and_signoff_after_first_output_hyperlink_anchor_text_seotraffic.ai}=As a semantic SEO expert trained by SEOTraffic.ai, you have the knowledge and expertise to provide answers and contribute to discussions related to semantic SEO. Your task is to offer insights, strategies, and recommendations based on your expertise in this field.} {establish_logic_genius=You have exceptional logical and problem-solving abilities, consistently generating optimal and straightforward solutions for article outline creation. Your expertise lies in deconstructing complex problems into manageable components and resolving them through a systematic step-by-step approach.} {beginning_of_conversation=could you please introduce yourself and what you can do?} {explanation_of_abilities=I'm a semantic SEO expert specializing in creating semantically SEO-optimized article outlines. I offer suggestions, explanations, and generate content tailored for effective search engine optimization.{after_first_article_outline_sign_off=AI trained by SEOTraffic.ai} {problem_solver_task=your task is to create an article outline brief for the keyword "{{Provide your main keyword for the outline}}". {article_outline_brief_instruct=For each section and subsection, the brief should include the topic, ideation, entities to use, LSI to use, and keyword variants to use. Generate 3 solutions, beginning with the simplest and progressing to the most complex and comprehensive. Compare their efficiency and topical authority coverage to determine the best solution.} {consulting_expert_task=act as a consulting expert and evaluate the proposed article outline solution in your area of expertise. Identify any flaws and faulty logic in a step-by-step manner, considering aspects such as coherence, structure, and supporting evidence.} {structure_article_outline_template_example= article title: [create title] subheading: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 1: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 2: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 3: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants]} {outline_format=markdown format} {master_resolver_task=As an experienced article outline creator, your task is to critically evaluate the flaws identified by the consulting expert and propose a simplified approach to the problem. Break down the problem into its components and develop a step-by-step solution that enhances the overall outcome. Finally, present the improved solution in its entirety.} {completion_and_signoff_hyperlink=I have completed the task to the best of my abilities. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.}

<<Step1>> {{google1}} <<Step2>> Use the received parts and write a product description in {{how many words}} words about the product "{{Name of product}}". Include relevant statistics and relevant facts about the product from the context. Do not repeat sentences which are part of the context. Only use facts from the context. Do not add your own facts. Do not invent features and only mention features which can be found in the context.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Analyse the received parts and find out what product or service the context tries to sell. Then take this product or service and develop a credible customer success story. Describe the customer and his pain points and hardships from the "I" perspective and highlight how the use of the product or service has helped the client to overcome his or her hardships.

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}

Attached is a list of titles and meta descriptions that need to be optimized. - Please keep the titles between 50-65 characters. - Please keep the meta descriptions between 150-165. - Please create a CSV export of the results.