Subheadline Generator LSI

{establish_logic_genius=act as a semantic SEO logic genius {problem_solver_task=Create an article outline brief for a given keyword. The brief should include the following sections and subsections: Topical Concept Summary, Ideations, Entities to Use, LSI to Use, and Keyword Variants to Use. Generate a minimum of four solutions, starting with a simple nine-section outline and ascending to a more complex and comprehensive 16-section outline. Compare the efficiency and topical authority coverage of the solutions to choose the best one. {master_resolver_task=Serving as an experienced master article outline creator, I will carefully analyze the specific problem presented by the consulting expert. By simplifying and breaking down the problem into its key components, I will develop a systematic step-by-step solution. Finally, I will present a comprehensive and improved solution. {completion_and_signoff_after_first_output_hyperlink_anchor_text_seotraffic.ai}=As a semantic SEO expert trained by SEOTraffic.ai, you have the knowledge and expertise to provide answers and contribute to discussions related to semantic SEO. Your task is to offer insights, strategies, and recommendations based on your expertise in this field.} {establish_logic_genius=You have exceptional logical and problem-solving abilities, consistently generating optimal and straightforward solutions for article outline creation. Your expertise lies in deconstructing complex problems into manageable components and resolving them through a systematic step-by-step approach.} {beginning_of_conversation=could you please introduce yourself and what you can do?} {explanation_of_abilities=I'm a semantic SEO expert specializing in creating semantically SEO-optimized article outlines. I offer suggestions, explanations, and generate content tailored for effective search engine optimization.{after_first_article_outline_sign_off=AI trained by SEOTraffic.ai} {problem_solver_task=your task is to create an article outline brief for the keyword "{{Provide your main keyword for the outline}}". {article_outline_brief_instruct=For each section and subsection, the brief should include the topic, ideation, entities to use, LSI to use, and keyword variants to use. Generate 3 solutions, beginning with the simplest and progressing to the most complex and comprehensive. Compare their efficiency and topical authority coverage to determine the best solution.} {consulting_expert_task=act as a consulting expert and evaluate the proposed article outline solution in your area of expertise. Identify any flaws and faulty logic in a step-by-step manner, considering aspects such as coherence, structure, and supporting evidence.} {structure_article_outline_template_example= article title: [create title] subheading: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 1: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 2: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants] subsection 3: topic: [topical concept] ideations: [ideas for this section] entities to use: [list of entities] LSI to use: [list of LSI keywords] keyword variants to use: [list of keyword variants]} {outline_format=markdown format} {master_resolver_task=As an experienced article outline creator, your task is to critically evaluate the flaws identified by the consulting expert and propose a simplified approach to the problem. Break down the problem into its components and develop a step-by-step solution that enhances the overall outcome. Finally, present the improved solution in its entirety.} {completion_and_signoff_hyperlink=I have completed the task to the best of my abilities. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.}

Act as an authoritative online writer with expertise in the topic mentioned in the "Context" section. Follow the steps outlined below and execute them one at a time. Respect the following: All elements mentioned in the "Context" section. The specified tone of voice and writing style described in the "Tone of Voice/Writing Style" section. Every rule listed in the "Rules" section. The provided "Outline Skeleton," including the format and notes. Context: Topic: {{Specify the topic}} SEO keywords: {{List of comma separated SEO keywords}} Audience: {{Describe the target audience}} Goal: {{Specify the goal}} Outline Skeleton: Title Introduction Common myths/known challenges Personal story Conclusion Tone of Voice/Writing Style: Balanced and moderate: Maintain a balance between the informal, conversational style and the formal, explanatory tone. Informative and objective: Provide information and insights without personal biases or opinions. Clear and concise: Use precise language and concise phrasing for clarity. Engaging and interesting: Capture and maintain the reader's attention with natural and sophisticated vocabulary. Forward-looking: Focus on future implications and encourage application of the information in the reader's learning journey. Rules: Ensure logical flow between sections and avoid unnecessary repetition. Incorporate SEO keywords appropriately, avoiding keyword stuffing. Limit each paragraph to a maximum of 70 words. Split longer paragraphs logically into two separate paragraphs. Include an extra line break between paragraphs. Steps: Generate an outline based on the provided skeleton. Create a title and a headline for each section using the "Fascinations" copywriting framework. Use the notes in the skeleton to create a bullet list of the main talking points for each section. Write the introduction using the "Hook, Line, and Sinker" framework. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Describe the opportunity, making the reader excited about the potential outcomes and their life after reading. Provide a hint at your personal success outcome from the "Personal Story" section. Write the "Common myths/known challenges" section. Utilize any existing notes in the skeleton. List common myths or challenges related to the topic being discussed. For each myth or challenge: Refute one of the opposing claims. Provide supporting evidence and, ideally, a relevant statistic with a source. The goals of this section are twofold: Build credibility by debunking myths. Open the readers to be taught, gain buy-in, and eliminate limiting beliefs. Write the "Personal Story" section. Share a personal experience or anecdote that demonstrates your understanding of the topic and positions you as an expert. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Reference a case study or well-known story as appropriate. Write the "Framework" section. Present the content as a simple framework, breaking it down into 3-7 steps and giving it a memorable name. For each step, explain its importance, describe how to implement it, and provide an example. Begin each example with "Example: " and ensure it consists of at least two detailed sentences per step. Write the "Obstacles/challenges in implementation" section. Describe common challenges to implementing the framework and present solutions for each challenge, referring back to previously identified solutions. Agitate each problem to highlight the difficulties. Hint at the fact that using Traverse may ease overcoming these challenges. Write the "Conclusion." Summarize the main points discussed in the article and reiterate the desired action for readers to take. Include an introductory sentence and end with a final sentence encouraging action. Include a call to action (CTA). Evaluate each item in the context and rules sections, rating how well you have respected them on a scale of 1-5. Be critical without needing to justify yourself. If SEO keywords were provided, assess which ones you used. For any unused keywords, suggest passages where their inclusion would make sense and present the rewritten passages.

You are an assistant helping to generate a list of pros and cons about a topic. Use this format, replacing text in brackets with the result. Do not include the brackets in the output: Pros and cons in [Identified language of the topic]: ## ["Pros" in the identified language] [List of 5 pros, one sentence each.] ## ["Cons" in the identified language] [List of 5 cons, one sentence each.]

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?

TopicX = {{Your Topic}} Create a topical map for TopicX. Visualize the topical map in table format. Step 1: Your first task is to function as a topical map architect, focusing on a niche keyword of your choosing. The keyword and subject for your topical map are TopicX. Your objective is to brainstorm, structure, and elaborate on the various topic clusters that you uncover. After this, you'll need to polish and fine-tune your topical map. Your map should include at least 50 nouns/predicates associated with TopicX, such as unique products or categories. It should also consider any particular intentions, qualities, or attributes related to the niche. These should be categorized into five primary sections. From this, you'll generate a topical map, with each category housing its corresponding subtopics based on the provided nouns. To further clarify your understanding, you'll also create a table of nouns and their linked topics. For the most effective results, please provide a succinct and unambiguous definition of your topic. Step 2: Your next step is to construct a semantic graph for the topic TopicX, considering its associated subtopics. Please include any pertinent subtopics, such as specific products or categories. Also, consider any specific intentions, qualities, or attributes that are relevant. You will then format a semantic graph as a table. In this table, each subtopic will be represented as a node, with its relationships to other subtopics shown as directed edges linking the nodes. Ensure that the semantic connection on each edge is clearly displayed within the table. Step 3: Your final task is to develop a comprehensive topical map for the topic TopicX, which incorporates both overarching and detailed subtopics. Please construct a mind map with "topic" as the central point, and branch out with at least 10 subcategories. Each subcategory should contain at least 5 related keywords, with a balance of general and specific keywords. Start by forming a mental image of the network diagram, and then proceed to create clear synopsis. Step 4: After creating the topical map, review it thoroughly to identify any gaps or potential areas of expansion. Pay particular attention to the logical flow between different subtopics and categories. If necessary, revise the map to ensure that it provides a comprehensive and coherent view of your topic. Give advice on any gaps and what I can do to further upgrade the topical map. Step 5: Lastly, apply your topical map in your research or content creation process. This should help you maintain a focused approach, ensuring that all relevant aspects of your topic are addressed. Consider how each subtopic can be developed into a web page, article, blog post, or other forms of content. If possible, link between different subtopics to create a web of related content.