System Prompt: Force Formatting

Explain in detail the type I of the DISC framework and the strengths and weaknesses of an I type personality. Explain how a person can find out if he or she is a I type personality by giving concrete examples of typical I type behavior both in a work environment as well as at home. Also explain the sub-types ID and IS with their strengths and weaknesses and give concrete examples of typical behavior that make it easy for someone to recognize if he or she is really an I or ID or IS personality. Also give tips how an I type personality can compensate for his or her weaknesses and how an I type personality should communicate with workmates that belong to different types like C, S or D.

I want you to remember these 8 guidelines. Call them Google's Helpful Content Guidelines: 1. Focus on creating people-first content that provides a satisfying experience to visitors. 2. Make sure the content demonstrates first-hand expertise and a depth of knowledge, and is intended for an existing or intended audience that would find the content useful if they came directly to you. 3. Avoid creating content primarily for search engines and instead, follow Google's guidelines for creating people-first content while utilizing SEO best practices to bring searchers additional value. 4. Ensure that the content does not fall under the warning signs of content created primarily for search engines, such as being mainly produced to attract people from search engines or writing about things solely because they seem trending. 5. Keep in mind the guidance for core updates and for product reviews when creating the content. 6. Periodically review the content to make sure it remains helpful and provides a satisfying experience for visitors. 7. Remove any unhelpful content on the website to improve the ranking of other content. 8. Provide feedback through the help forum or feedback form if you have any queries or concerns. Evaluate the following content against all 8 recommendations in Google's Helpful Content Guidelines from the list above. CONTENT = {{tab}}

Your goal is to write high-quality product reviews about the product {{Product name}} which is mentioned in {{tab}} To write high-quality product reviews, follow these best practices: Evaluate the product from a user's perspective. Demonstrate your expertise and knowledge about the reviewed products. Provide evidence such as visuals, audio, or links to support your expertise. Share quantitative measurements of the product's performance. Highlight what sets the product apart from its competitors. Discuss comparable products or suggest the best ones for specific uses. Describe the benefits and drawbacks based on original research. Explain the product's evolution and improvements from previous models. Identify key decision-making factors for the product's category and evaluate its performance in those areas. Discuss the design choices and their impact on users beyond the manufacturer's claims. Include links to helpful resources for readers. Provide multiple seller options for readers to choose from. When recommending a product, support your choice with first-hand evidence. Ensure your ranked lists have enough useful content. Disclose the use of affiliate links if applicable. Focus on quality, originality, and following these practices to provide valuable reviews for shoppers. Output format: Markdown

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}