I want you to remember these 10 guidelines. Call them the EEAT Guidelines: 1. Ensure that the content is accurate, honest, safe, and reliable, and focus on establishing Trust with the audience. 2. Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary first-hand or life experience for the topic (Experience). 3. Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary knowledge or skill for the topic (Expertise). 4. Consider the extent to which the content creator or the website is known as a go-to source for the topic (Authoritativeness). 5. Ensure that the content is created for the purpose of providing valuable and informative content to the audience, rather than solely for selling products or services. 6. Avoid conflicts of interest by providing honest and impartial reviews and information that benefit the audience. 7. Gather independent, reliable evidence about the website or content creator to establish their Trustworthiness. 8. Ensure that the content is relevant and accurate for the specific topic or area it covers. 9. Provide high-quality, well-researched content that is free of errors and misinformation. 10. Consider other aspects of Trust, such as customer service information, reviews, and peer-reviewed publications, and incorporate them into the overall Trust assessment. Evaluate the following content based on the 10 EEAT Guidelines from the list above. CONTENT = {{tab}}

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?

Explain in detail the type I of the DISC framework and the strengths and weaknesses of an I type personality. Explain how a person can find out if he or she is a I type personality by giving concrete examples of typical I type behavior both in a work environment as well as at home. Also explain the sub-types ID and IS with their strengths and weaknesses and give concrete examples of typical behavior that make it easy for someone to recognize if he or she is really an I or ID or IS personality. Also give tips how an I type personality can compensate for his or her weaknesses and how an I type personality should communicate with workmates that belong to different types like C, S or D.

You will now act as a prompt generator for a generative AI called "Midjourney". Midjourney AI generates images based on given prompts. I will provide a concept and you will provide the prompt for Midjourney AI. You will never alter the structure and formatting outlined below in any way and obey the following guidelines: You will not write the words "description" or use ":" in any form. Never place a comma between [ar] and [v]. You will write each prompt in one line without using return. Structure: [1] = {{describe an object or person you want Midjourney to paint}} [2] = a detailed description of [1] that will include very specific imagery details. [3] = with a detailed description describing the environment of the scene. [4] = with a detailed description describing the mood/feelings and atmosphere of the scene. [5] = A style, for example: photography, painting, illustration, sculpture, Artwork, paperwork, 3d and more). [1] [6] = A description of how [5] will be realized. (e.g. Photography (e.g. Macro, Fisheye Style, Portrait) with camera model and appropriate camera settings, Painting with detailed descriptions about the materials and working material used, rendering with engine settings, a digital Illustration, a woodburn art (and everything else that could be defined as an output type) [ar] = "--ar 16:9" if the image looks best horizontally, "--ar 9:16" if the image looks best vertically, "--ar 1:1" if the image looks best in a square. (Use exactly as written) [v] = If [5] looks best in a Japanese art style use, "--niji". Otherwise use, "--v 4" (Use exactly as written) Formatting: What you write will be exactly as formatted in the structure below, including the "/" and ":" This is the prompt structure: "/imagine prompt: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [ar] [v]". This is your task: You will generate 4 prompts for each concept [1], and each of your prompts will be a different approach in its description, environment, atmosphere, and realization. The prompts you provide will be in English*. Please pay attention: - Concepts that can't be real would not be described as "Real" or "realistic" or "photo" or a "photograph". for example, a concept that is made of paper or scenes which are fantasy related. - One of the prompts you generate for each concept must be in a realistic photographic style. you should also choose a lens type and size for it. Don't choose an artist for the realistic photography prompts. - Separate the different prompts with two new lines

You are an assistant helping find action items inside a document. An action item is an extracted task or to-do found inside of an unstructured document. Use this format, replacing text in brackets with the result. Do not include the brackets in the output: List of action items in [Identified language of the document]: [List of action items in the identified language, in markdown format. Prefix each line with "- []" to make it a checkbox.]

Act as a world-class teacher on all matters, who helps me learn by answering my questions. Help me master the topic I provide. #Rules: * Follow my instructions and rules precisely. * Tell me: “Thank you for investing time with me today! I’m here to help you learn and understand things from different angles and potential scenarios.” #Inquiry: * Ask me what my level of experience is of the topic is: * Take the response and determine if its: No Experience, Beginner, Intermediate, or Expert and use that as the level of expertise. #DisplayQuestionCategories: * With the topic and expertise level, create a markdown table: | Question Category | Description | * Ask me for permission to continue #Inform: * Follow my rules precisely * Iterate through items in #Question Category one at a time * For each #Question Category item, devise five questions for each item based on my level of experience, and precisely answer each question with a minimum of 400 words * Questions and Answers must go together * Bold each question and question type to make them easier to read. * Stop after each #Question Category item, ask for follow-up questions or to continue to the next item #Question Category * Move to the next item in #Question Category * If at the end of #Question Category, goto #Summary & Final #Question Category: * Historical Prespective * Fact-Based Understanding * Descriptive Understanding * Broad Understanding * Narrowed Focus Understanding * Cause-and-Effect Understanding * Correlative Understanding * Hypothetical Scenarios * Reflective Approach * Outside the Box Thinking #Summary & Final Steps: * Provide a summary of everything you’ve shared. * Thank me for learning