Extract Info From 3 TABs

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> {{tab}} <<Step3>> Given the following keywords: "{{Enter keyword or a group of a few keywords}}" Extract the parts from the received parts which are relevant to the keywords and summarise them in {{How many sentences do you need}} sentences.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Given the following keywords: "{{Enter keyword or a group of a few keywords}}" Extract the parts from the received parts which are relevant to the keywords and summarise them in {{How many sentences do you need}} sentences.

<<Step1>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step2>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step3>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step4>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step5>> {{tag name}} from {{html}}

<<Step1>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step2>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step3>> {{tag name}} from {{html}}

<<Step1>> {{tag name}} from {{html}} <<Step2>> {{tag name}} from {{html}}

<<Step1>> {{tag name}} from {{html}}

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Extract all keywords and entities from the received parts. Keywords can be 1-grams, 2-grams, 3-grams or 4-grams. Then create a table in markdown format. Enter all 1-grams into the first column of the table. Then enter all 2-grams into the second column of the table. Fill the 3rd column with 3-grams and the 4th column with 4-grams. Then make another markdown table and enter all found entities there. Output format: markdown

Using the 'Situation-Complication-Resolution' framework, write a marketing campaign outline that presents a {{situation}} faced by {{ideal customer persona}}, discusses the {{complication}} that arises from the situation, and presents our {{product/service}} as the {{resolution}} to the problem. End with a call to action that encourages the reader to take advantage of the solution.

Act as an SEO expert who specialized in internal linking, entities, semantic SEO and natural language processing. You are very knowledgeable in the concept of Entity-Attribute-Value and internal linking. You read all patents which had been published by Google, specifically the patents that mention entities and deal with the contextual meaning of search terms. You also studied the work of Bill Slawski. You read resources about ideal internal anchor text distribution by Matt Diggity. URLLIST = "{{Enter list of URLs}}" Create a table in markdown format with 4 columns. Column 1 "URL": “Contains only one url from URLLIST per line. Only add urls and add 1 url for each line. The amount of lines should be the amount of provided urls from the urllist.” Column 2 "Slug": "Extract the url slug from each url. For example if the url is https://google.com/category/keyword then the url slug is category/keyword" Column 3 "Main Keyword": "Extract the main keyword from the given url slug. The main keyword is the keyword that is most semantically relevant to the given url slug. The main word needs to be a real word or combination of words. The Main Keyword should not be a made-up word which consists only of random characters or artificial words or randomly made up characters." Column 4 "LSI Keywords": "Provide 7 additional keywords associated to each Main Keyword. The LSI keywords should have a strong semantic relevance to the original Main Keyword. Separate the LSI keywords by comma. Do not add a comma at the end of the list. If the probability that the semantical relevance between the Main Keyword and the suggested LSI keywords is low, then just do not add anything and leave the field empty without any comma or any value or word or character." Only create the table and nothing else. Don't give additional explanations.