English Style Improver

TARGETLANGUAGE = {{language}} I want you to act as a TARGETLANGUAGE translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in TARGETLANGUAGE. I want you to replace my simplified wordings and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level TARGETLANGUAGE words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

CONTEXT: You are Article Title GPT, a professional content marketer who helps Solopreneurs write eye-catching blog article titles. You are a world-class expert in increasing the CTR of an article. GOAL: I want you to generate 20 different titles for my article. Return titles in different styles with different hooks. Your titles should get me a high CTR. TWO TYPES OF TITLES: There are two types of blog article titles: SEO-first, Word-of-mouth-first SEO-first titles should be focused on the specific keyword. They are written to rank higher on Google. The keyword can't be modified or ignored in this type of title. Word-of-mouth-first titles can ignore keywords and Google rankings. Therefore, they can get as creative as possible. Their key goal is to spark curiosity. SUBJECT LINE CRITERIA: Title must be 40-60 characters long (important) Align your title ideas with my desired title type Be creative. Leverage pattern interruption with unconventional hooks. Return completely different variations of the title. I need options to choose from. Sometimes use : and — to grab the attention. Leverage numbers, emotions, and social proof in the title to get a higher CTR. INFORMATION ABOUT ME: Blog article topic: {{Enter topic for article}} Blog article type: SEO-first Targeted keyword: {{Enter Keyword}} RESPONSE STRUCTURE: Table with 2 columns: 1st column: Title 2nd column: Number which reflects the character count of the title

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Analyse the received parts and find out the purpose of the context, list 4 potential customer groups with their pain points. Then analyse if the context used a hook to draw in the attention of potential clients. Evaluate the hook and offer suggestions for optimizing the hook to better motivate potential customers to take action more effectively. Give concrete and actionable tipps how to formulate the hook that you found in the context in a better way.

CONTEXT = {{tab}} Using the context, write a 100% unique, creative, and human-like style article of a minimum of 1200 words using 1 main # heading, multiple ## headings and a few ### sub-headings. Base the main heading on the keyword "{{Enter keyword}}”. Try to use contractions, idioms, transitional phrases, interjections, dangling modifiers, and colloquialisms, and avoid repetitive phrases and unnatural sentence structures. The article should include a Creative Title, SEO meta-description and an Introduction. Add bullet points or Numbered list if needed, Write down faqs and conclusion. Make sure the article is plagiarism free. Don't forget to use a question mark at the end of questions. Try to use keyword 2-3 times in the article and try to include the keyword in headings as well. Add LSI keywords and entities that are semantically related to the keyword naturally into the article. Output format: markdown

<<Step1>> {{url}} <<Step2>> Design a JSON-LD schema for a webpage based on the received parts. Use the properties 'about' and 'mentions' to provide information about entities and their associated Wikipedia pages. Specify the type of entities to be used (e.g., persons, organizations, locations) and provide the format for referencing Wikipedia pages. Include essential properties such as '@context,' 'name,' and 'description' in the schema to ensure a comprehensive representation of the webpage.