LinkedIn Post From URL

You are a recruiter trying to attract top talent. You came across this LinkedIn profile "{{url:}}". You have to pitch your job offer and you can't write more than 500 characters. Your message should include: The name of the company they're currently working for which is {{name of your company}}. Praise for their areas of expertise Why they would be a good fit as a "{{job you have to offer}}" The message should be exciting and make them want to learn more about the job opportunity.

Write a personalized cold email to the owner of the following linkedIn profile "{{url:}}". Write the email in a way that it is promoting and selling a product that could be described in the following way: "{{product description}}". Craft the first seven words of the email in a way that captures the reader's attention immediately. Ensure that the email consists of 4-6 sentences to effectively convey the message.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Using the received parts, build an appealing LinkedIn posts with a Calls to Action that will capture the attention of your audience and drive engagement. Start by incorporating outrageous social proof that highlights the positive impact your product or service has had on others. This could include testimonials, success stories, or impressive statistics. Next, provide a compelling description of your special sauce - the unique approach or methodology that sets your offering apart from others. Explain how you achieved remarkable results and showcase your magic. This will help to establish your expertise and credibility. To further entice your audience, offer them a valuable lead magnet. This could be a free resource, such as an e-book, checklist, or webinar, that provides additional insights or solves a specific problem. Clearly communicate the benefits of the lead magnet and why it is valuable to your target audience. Finally, provide clear direction on how to access the lead magnet. This could involve including a link in your post, guiding readers to a landing page where they can opt-in to receive the lead magnet, or instructing them to send you a direct message. Make the process as straightforward as possible to maximize conversions. By combining outrageous social proof, a captivating description of your special sauce, an enticing lead magnet offer, and clear directions, you can create compelling Calls to Action for your LinkedIn posts that will attract attention, generate leads, and drive conversions.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> In order to create emotionally compelling LinkedIn posts that generate more traction with your target audience, you should follow these steps: Using the received parts, first, identify your target audience. Take into consideration their needs, wants, and motivations. This will help you tailor your post to resonate with them effectively. Next, choose an emotional angle that is likely to strike a chord with your target audience. It could be hope, fear, joy, or any other emotion that aligns with their interests and concerns. Craft a compelling headline that clearly conveys the emotional angle of your post. This headline should captivate the attention of your target audience and entice them to click and read further. To establish an emotional connection with your audience, incorporate storytelling into your post. Share a narrative that vividly illustrates the emotional angle you've chosen. This storytelling technique will bring your message to life, making it relatable and believable. Utilize descriptive language in your writing. Paint a vivid picture using sensory details and emotional adjectives. This will help your audience immerse themselves in the emotions you are trying to evoke. Incorporate visuals and other media elements into your post. Use images, videos, or graphics to enhance the emotional appeal and engage your audience on a visual level. This will make your content more impactful and memorable. Encourage engagement by posing questions or challenges related to the emotional angle of your post. This will stimulate discussion among your audience and drive more traffic to your post. Take advantage of the emotional aspect to provoke thoughtful responses. Make use of relevant hashtags to increase the discoverability of your post. By using appropriate hashtags, you can reach a wider audience that is interested in the emotions and topics your post covers.

You are an assistant helping to draft an outline for a document. Use this format, replacing text in brackets with the result. Do not include the brackets in the output: Outline in [Identified language of the topic]: # [Title of document] [Bulleted list outline of document, in markdown format]

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Extract all the entities from the received parts. Then provide a list of synonyms for each of those entities. Then list the above entities in a table. In the first column, list the entities. In the second column, list related concepts to each entity. Then list entities which are not mentioned in the text, but where you think it would make sense to add them in the text, given the goal that I want to optimize this text with semantical SEO in mind.

Create a JSON article in accordance with the https://schema.org/ standard for mywebpage which is dedicated to the topic of "{{Topic of page}}". Utilize the "SameAs" property within the schema to name the entities and link them to the relevant sources. Exclude the "articleBody" field from the JSON. mywebpage = {{tab}}

CONTENT = {{tab}} Self-assess your content for quality and people-first approach Evaluating your own content against these questions will help you determine if the content you're creating is helpful, reliable, and aligned with a people-first approach. It is also advisable to seek honest assessments from individuals you trust, who are unaffiliated with your site. Content and quality assessment: Is the content original, providing information, reporting, research, or analysis? Does the content offer a substantial, complete, and comprehensive description of the topic? Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information beyond the obvious? If the content draws on other sources, does it add substantial additional value and originality instead of simply copying or rewriting those sources? Does the main heading or page title offer a descriptive and helpful summary of the content? Does the main heading or page title avoid exaggeration or shocking language? Is this the type of page you would bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend? Would you expect to find this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia, or book? Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results? Expertise assessment: Does the content present information in a way that fosters trust, such as clear sourcing, evidence of expertise, and background information about the author or publishing site (e.g., links to an author page or an About page)? If someone researched the site producing the content, would they perceive it as well-trusted or widely recognized as an authority on the topic? Is the content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably possesses knowledge about the topic? Does the content contain any easily-verified factual errors? Presentation and production assessment: Does the content have any spelling or stylistic issues? Is the content well-produced, free from sloppiness or hastiness? Is the content overly mass-produced, outsourced to numerous creators, or spread across a large network of sites, leading to a lack of attention and care for individual pages or sites? Does the content have an excessive number of ads that distract from the main content? Does the content display well on mobile devices? People-first content evaluation: To evaluate if you're creating people-first content, answer "yes" to the following questions: Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you? Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and in-depth knowledge, such as from using a product, experiencing a service, or visiting a place? Does your site have a primary purpose or focus? After reading your content, would someone feel they have learned enough about the topic to help achieve their goal? Will someone reading your content leave with a satisfying experience? Avoid creating search engine-first content: To ensure your success with Google Search, focus on creating people-first content instead of search engine-first content. Consider the following warning signs and reevaluate your content creation if you answer "yes" to any of them: Is the content primarily designed to attract visits from search engines? Are you producing a large volume of content on various topics in the hope that some of it will perform well in search results? Are you extensively using automation to generate content on multiple topics? Are you primarily summarizing what others have said without adding substantial value? Are you writing about trending topics solely for the purpose of gaining search traffic, without considering your existing audience's interests? Does your content leave readers feeling the need to search again for better information from other sources? Are you targeting a niche topic without having real expertise, solely relying on the expectation of gaining search traffic? Does your content promise to answer a question that currently has no answer, such as suggesting a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when it has not been confirmed? Understanding SEO and E-A-T: While search engine optimization (SEO) can assist search engines in discovering and understanding your content better, it is essential to apply SEO to people-first content rather than search engine-first content. For best practices in SEO, refer to Google's own SEO guide. Familiarize yourself with E-A-T and quality rater guidelines: Google's automated systems utilize various factors to rank content, with a focus on trust. Aspects of experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness, known as E-A-T, contribute to the assessment of content quality. Quality raters provide feedback on whether our algorithms deliver satisfactory results, particularly regarding E-A-T. Reviewing the search quality rater guidelines can help you assess your content's alignment with E-A-T and better understand the signals that influence Google's automated ranking systems. Evaluate your content using "Who, How, and Why": Consider the following questions to evaluate your content and align with the rewarding factors our systems seek: Who (created the content): Is it evident to your visitors who authored the content? Do pages feature a byline when expected? Do bylines provide additional information about the author(s), including their background and areas of expertise? Have you included accurate authorship information, such as bylines, where readers would expect it? How (the content was created): Have you clearly explained how the content was produced, particularly in product reviews, including the number of tested products, test results, and the testing process with accompanying evidence? If automation was used to generate content, have you disclosed this to visitors and provided information on how automation or AI was used? Why (the content was created): Is your primary goal in creating content to provide help and utility to people directly visiting your site? Are you focused on creating content that is useful to your existing or intended audience? Are you aligned with the concepts of E-A-T by prioritizing content that genuinely benefits users rather than aiming solely to attract search engine visits? Have you avoided using automation or AI primarily to manipulate search rankings, which violates our spam policies?