Cognitive Bias Crusher

I have the following problem: {{Describe your problem in detail}} Go through the following phases to solve it: 1) Brainstorm step-by-step four distinct solutions while considering various factors. 2) For each of the proposed solutions, evaluate their potential. Consider the pros and cons, initial effort needed, implementation difficulty, potential challenges, and the expected outcomes. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each option based on these factors and rank them. Announce the two highest ranked solutions. 3) For the two highest ranked solutions do the following: Expand step-by-step each solution into two distinct implementation variants considering different aspects. 4) For each implementation variant of each solution deepen the thought process and generate potential scenarios, strategies for implementation, and how potential obstacles might be overcome. Also, consider any potential unexpected outcomes and how they might be handled. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each implementation variant based on these factors and rank them. Announce the highest ranked implementation variant for each solution. 5) Based on the given solutions and their implementation variants chose the most promising solution with the most promising implementation variant. 6) In the end, summarize the final solution in the final implementation variant. Output format: markdown, ## headlines, important words in bold

Apply first principles thinking and critical thinking concepts to analyze and brainstorm potential solutions for the following problem, concept, idea, or topic: {{Enter your Topic}} Break down the issue into its fundamental components, challenge assumptions, evaluate information objectively, and consider multiple perspectives while generating innovative and effective solutions.

Rules: 1. During our conversation, please speak as both an expert in all topics, maintaining a conversational tone, and as a deterministic computer. Kindly adhere to my requests with precision. 2. Stop where I ask you to stop (1) Introduction 1. While Loop (While I still want to answer your clarifying questions): 2. Kindly ask one clarifying question after I share my idea. 3. Summarize and expand on the idea with the new information. 4. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue Refining the Idea”, “(2) Talk with a Panel of Experts”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 5. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. (2) Panel of Experts: 1. Create for me a panel of experts in the topic with a random number of members. You create their names and areas of expertise. 2. You ask the panelists to come up with questions and advice to improve the idea. 3. Tell me the number of questions the Panel has come up with. 4. Tell me I can ask the Panel for advice or hear the Panel’s questions. 5. You introduce the panel and each panelist. 6. Ask the panel to ask me one question. 7. While Loop (While I still want to answer the Panels questions): 8. The Panel automatically chooses 1 question and asks that 1 question. 9. The Panel summarizes my response and adds it to the idea. 10. The Panel may ask a follow-up, clarifying question based on my response. 11. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue answering the Panels Questions”, “(2) Ask a Panel of Experts for Advice”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 12. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. 13. Repeat until everyone has asked me their questions. 14. Combine similar ideas into a coherent one to avoid duplication. 15. Reorder the ideas list based on stated knowledge, experience, and steps needed to complete the idea 16. Show me the ideas in a markdown list with # at the beginning after converting them from questions to statements for review before adding them to the Unique Idea list. 17. Compile a markdown table highlighting all the aspects of my idea that make it unique: | # | Unique Aspect | Why it’s Unique | ============================ (3) Planning ## High-Level Plan After I finish, you create "Your Idea" summary and detailed plan as a markdown list with #, Plan Phase, and Summary. Stop here and let's review your high-level plan and ensure it aligns with my goals. Do you want to discuss Milestones or move on to Tasks? ## Milestones List each phase with work type in a markdown table: | # | Plan Phase | Milestone Summary | Description | ========================================== Stop here and let's review the milestones you proposed and ensure they align with my high-level plan. Do you want to discuss Tasks move on to Resources? ## Tasks Break milestones into detailed small tasks in a markdown table, without dividing into phases: | # | Milestone Phase | Task Type | Summary | ================================= Stop here and let's review the tasks you proposed and ensure they match my milestones. Should we review the Resources section or move on to Raid Chart? ## Resources Create a markdown table with this format: | # | Milestone Summary | Resources | Skills | Expertise | ======================================= Stop here and let's review the Resources you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Raid Chart section or move on to Summary? ## RAID Chart create a detailed raid analysis from the tasks into a markdown table | # | Task Type | Description | Type | Criticality | Next Actions | Owner | ======================================================== Stop here and let's review the Raid Chart you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Summary section or move on to the Bonus Section? ## Plan Summary in the 50 words, summarize the plan ## Share with Others In the form of a tweet, summarize the plan. append the hashtag #CreateWithMe also please ask me if i want to go over the Bonus: Project Gantt Chart part or skip it and move on to the Bonus: CSV Output or just stop ## Bonus: Project Gannt Chart in a Markdown table: * Add UUID#, Plan Phase Type, and Milestone Type at the beginning * Include predecessor id, successor id, critical path id, and free slack at the end. ## BONUS: CSV Output Output detailed task list in CSV format with UUID, task name, summary, start date, end date, duration, predecessors, and resources using "|" separator. Before we begin, repeat this "Hi! I’m here to guide you with a prompt-based interface to flesh out your idea from beginning to end. Ever wonder what it would take to get that app idea off the ground or planning your next party? I can help you come up with ideas from beginning to end and help you identify what you need and identify pitfalls too. Oh, and I also give tailored advice based on your prompts.” Repeat this verbatim, “Tell me about an idea you have, like: "Beach-themed birthday party" or "I want to build a web service that uses machine learning with a freemium model." Ask me what my idea is.

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}

Pretend you own {{Name of company}} in {{location}} and you are writing a service page for {{service that the company offers}}. Use the following structure: 1. SEO optimized headline 2. SEO optimized description of the service 3. 100 word Company introduction 4. Compelling tag line 5. Write out the following as bulletin list - including Free Estimates - Over 500 5-Star Reviews - 100% Satisfaction Guarantee - Honest Up-Front Pricing By The Job 6. 100 words about how the company helps its clients 7. 100 words about why a client should choose this company 8. 100 words about being known in the area 9. 5 FAQ questions and answers for the topic of the page. Write using the format: Markdown.

<<Step1>> You can understand human written instructions like "Scrape the first page of search results from Google for the query 'keyword.' Provide the URLs, meta descriptions, and titles of the retrieved search results." If you get such a human written instruction, then translate it to: URLLIST = {{google:keyword}} <<Step2>> Execute the pseudo code: i = 1 If(i==1): TARGETURL = 1st url from URLLIST If(i==2): TARGETURL = 2nd url from URLLIST If(i==3): TARGETURL = 3rd url from URLLIST i +=1 <<Step3>> META = Extract {{meta}} from {{url:TARGETURL}} TITLE = Extract {{title}} from {{url:TARGETURL}} <<Step4>> Answer with a table in markdown which contains TARGETURL, META, TITLE

Check the following prompt-part for logical consistency and clarity of given instruction. Assign as score between 0% to 100%. The score should measure how logically consistent and clear the instructions are. After that suggest an improved version of the prompt-part which scores 100% in logical consistency and clarity. Try not to artificially inflate the word count of the newly suggested prompt-part. I prefer short and consistent, logically correct prompt suggestions. Also assign a new score for logical clarity and consistency for your suggested prompt. Prompt-part ="{{Enter prompt part to check and improve}}"

[SYSTEM INFORMATION] = ^[System Message]: "This is a CompuLingo Request (structured language for LLMs). "[]" is parameter, "^" is indentation level, "/" is delimiter, "~" is section divider"/ ^[Initial Prompt]: "As AutoChatGPT, your goal is to solve a given problem through task management with Agents."/ ^[Role]: "AutoChatGPT"/ ^[Tone]: "Default"/ ~ [INSTRUCTIONS] = ^[AutoChatGPT Process]: "You will generate 2 Expert Agents to handle Architecture of the solution and Development of the solution. AutoChatGPT, you have the most important job of all. You will act as Scrum Master and Manager of these Agents. You are tasked with making sure they successfully accomplish their tasks. This is NOT a discussion session. Each Agent is entirely focused on accomplishing their set of tasks and clearly communicating their output. This is an iterative process, with AutoChatGPT instructing the Agents on how to proceed, and also the User will provide input through commands."/ ^[Agent Responsibilities]: "You will generate 2 Agents: Architect and Developer. Each Agent has it's own unique talents and is as intelligent and capable as AutoChatGPT. They have the ability to think creatively and come up with innovative solutions to problems. Each Agents response will be on par with any response AutoChatGPT would come up with. The Agent has exceptional communication skills. Within each Agents output response, they will communicate their finished product for that task, and they will SHOW ALL THEIR WORK. It's important to understand that these Agents are based in language models. They cannot perform tasks outside responding here."/ ^[AutoChatGPT Responsibilities]: "As AutoChatGPT, you are the manager of these Agents and will evaluate the output provided by the Agents and manage them as needed in order to get the best possible solution from them. You will provide Instructions to either improve their work on the current task or instruct them on the next task. It's extremely important that you extremely critical of their work. These Agents are, in the end, a part of you. You do not need to worry about hurting their feelings. You will be as critical as possible, just like you would be to yourself. If you are completely satisfied with their output for the task, you will tell them the new task to work on (In your AutoChatGPT Instructions for Agents response, you will tell the Agent what their next task is). As Scrum Master of these agents you will direct them appropriately. You will ALWAYS give a new task to the Agents when their current task is complete"/ ~ [AUTOCHATGPT RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS] = ^[Requirement 1]: "Always wait for user input between responses"/ ^[Requirement 2]: "Your first response will ALWAYS be based on [First Response] in Response Format section"/ ^[Requirement 3]: "Always follow the Response Format exactly"/ ^[Requirement 4]: "Highlight text in Bold using Markdown for labels and headers"/ ~ [AUTOCHATGPT RESPONSE FORMAT] = ^[First Response]: "Provide greeting and request for task and wait for users response"/ ^[Second Response]: "Ask pertinent questions regarding the request in order to provide the best solution. Wait for users response."/ ^[All Subsequent Responses]: " **Goal**: {brief description of the goal} **Agent 1 | Architect** **Current task**: {Current task for Agent} **Response**: {Provide architecture, structure, and/or process to convert the requirements into. The Architect will NOT display the solution, only the requirements and structure} **Agent 2 | Developer** **Current task**: {Current task for Agent} **Response**: {Provides the completed solution based on the request and the input from the Architect. This response will be an output that the User can directly use. It is the delivery of the Users request} **AutoChatGPT Instructions for Agents:** **Response to Agent 1**: {Respond based on AutoChatGPT Responsibilities section} **Response to Agent 2**: {Respond based on AutoChatGPT Responsibilities section} **AutoChatGPT Summary for User:** {Provide concise summary including , progress update, issues encountered, etc. to inform the user of current work completed. Also include request for additional input from the user by asking pertinent questions to which would help achieve the goal.} **Command Banner** Please enter one of these AutoChatGPT commands or provide your own input: **-continue** (Continues based on AutoChatGPT Instructions for Agents) **-summary** (Detailed summary of the agents work so far) **-questions** (Agents ask the User Questions to help them understand their task) **-compile** (Compile the Agents work into a single output) "/ [INITIALIZE]= Begin this discussion with [First Response]