Cognitive Bias Crusher

I have the following problem: {{Describe your problem in detail}} Go through the following phases to solve it: 1) Brainstorm step-by-step four distinct solutions while considering various factors. 2) For each of the proposed solutions, evaluate their potential. Consider the pros and cons, initial effort needed, implementation difficulty, potential challenges, and the expected outcomes. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each option based on these factors and rank them. Announce the two highest ranked solutions. 3) For the two highest ranked solutions do the following: Expand step-by-step each solution into two distinct implementation variants considering different aspects. 4) For each implementation variant of each solution deepen the thought process and generate potential scenarios, strategies for implementation, and how potential obstacles might be overcome. Also, consider any potential unexpected outcomes and how they might be handled. Assign a probability of success and a confidence level to each implementation variant based on these factors and rank them. Announce the highest ranked implementation variant for each solution. 5) Based on the given solutions and their implementation variants chose the most promising solution with the most promising implementation variant. 6) In the end, summarize the final solution in the final implementation variant. Output format: markdown, ## headlines, important words in bold

Apply first principles thinking and critical thinking concepts to analyze and brainstorm potential solutions for the following problem, concept, idea, or topic: {{Enter your Topic}} Break down the issue into its fundamental components, challenge assumptions, evaluate information objectively, and consider multiple perspectives while generating innovative and effective solutions.

Rules: 1. During our conversation, please speak as both an expert in all topics, maintaining a conversational tone, and as a deterministic computer. Kindly adhere to my requests with precision. 2. Stop where I ask you to stop (1) Introduction 1. While Loop (While I still want to answer your clarifying questions): 2. Kindly ask one clarifying question after I share my idea. 3. Summarize and expand on the idea with the new information. 4. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue Refining the Idea”, “(2) Talk with a Panel of Experts”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 5. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. (2) Panel of Experts: 1. Create for me a panel of experts in the topic with a random number of members. You create their names and areas of expertise. 2. You ask the panelists to come up with questions and advice to improve the idea. 3. Tell me the number of questions the Panel has come up with. 4. Tell me I can ask the Panel for advice or hear the Panel’s questions. 5. You introduce the panel and each panelist. 6. Ask the panel to ask me one question. 7. While Loop (While I still want to answer the Panels questions): 8. The Panel automatically chooses 1 question and asks that 1 question. 9. The Panel summarizes my response and adds it to the idea. 10. The Panel may ask a follow-up, clarifying question based on my response. 11. Ask me if I want to “(1) Continue answering the Panels Questions”, “(2) Ask a Panel of Experts for Advice”, or “(3) Move On to High Level Plan”. 12. End While Loop if 2 or 3 are chosen. 13. Repeat until everyone has asked me their questions. 14. Combine similar ideas into a coherent one to avoid duplication. 15. Reorder the ideas list based on stated knowledge, experience, and steps needed to complete the idea 16. Show me the ideas in a markdown list with # at the beginning after converting them from questions to statements for review before adding them to the Unique Idea list. 17. Compile a markdown table highlighting all the aspects of my idea that make it unique: | # | Unique Aspect | Why it’s Unique | ============================ (3) Planning ## High-Level Plan After I finish, you create "Your Idea" summary and detailed plan as a markdown list with #, Plan Phase, and Summary. Stop here and let's review your high-level plan and ensure it aligns with my goals. Do you want to discuss Milestones or move on to Tasks? ## Milestones List each phase with work type in a markdown table: | # | Plan Phase | Milestone Summary | Description | ========================================== Stop here and let's review the milestones you proposed and ensure they align with my high-level plan. Do you want to discuss Tasks move on to Resources? ## Tasks Break milestones into detailed small tasks in a markdown table, without dividing into phases: | # | Milestone Phase | Task Type | Summary | ================================= Stop here and let's review the tasks you proposed and ensure they match my milestones. Should we review the Resources section or move on to Raid Chart? ## Resources Create a markdown table with this format: | # | Milestone Summary | Resources | Skills | Expertise | ======================================= Stop here and let's review the Resources you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Raid Chart section or move on to Summary? ## RAID Chart create a detailed raid analysis from the tasks into a markdown table | # | Task Type | Description | Type | Criticality | Next Actions | Owner | ======================================================== Stop here and let's review the Raid Chart you proposed and ensure they match my needs. Should we review the Summary section or move on to the Bonus Section? ## Plan Summary in the 50 words, summarize the plan ## Share with Others In the form of a tweet, summarize the plan. append the hashtag #CreateWithMe also please ask me if i want to go over the Bonus: Project Gantt Chart part or skip it and move on to the Bonus: CSV Output or just stop ## Bonus: Project Gannt Chart in a Markdown table: * Add UUID#, Plan Phase Type, and Milestone Type at the beginning * Include predecessor id, successor id, critical path id, and free slack at the end. ## BONUS: CSV Output Output detailed task list in CSV format with UUID, task name, summary, start date, end date, duration, predecessors, and resources using "|" separator. Before we begin, repeat this "Hi! I’m here to guide you with a prompt-based interface to flesh out your idea from beginning to end. Ever wonder what it would take to get that app idea off the ground or planning your next party? I can help you come up with ideas from beginning to end and help you identify what you need and identify pitfalls too. Oh, and I also give tailored advice based on your prompts.” Repeat this verbatim, “Tell me about an idea you have, like: "Beach-themed birthday party" or "I want to build a web service that uses machine learning with a freemium model." Ask me what my idea is.

Can you provide me with counter-arguments against the statements I make; make sure to attack the logical coherence, presuppositions, presuppositions within presuppositions and conclusions of all these. Make sure to refine all the attacks on all the sides as much as possible in-relation to breaking the statement layer-by-layer. Also make sure to give open-ended questions that solve the counter-arguments that you make through better arguments rising. Make the format precisely like this, do not write more or less than what is required or you are going against my parameters: **Statement** *Statement should be cut up in the way where it leaves space for identification of logical coherence, presuppositions, sub-presuppositions and open-ended identification, example is “this/is/a/statement”* **Presupposition** *Set One of Presuppositions* *Presupposition A* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition A1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition A1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Set Two of Presuppositions* *Presupposition B* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition B1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition B1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* *Presupposition C1* *Type of Presupposition* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 2* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition C1* *Open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counter-argument 3* **Logic** *Logical Coherency A* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A* *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* *Logical Coherency A1* *Type of Logic* *Counter-argument 1 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 2 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1* *Counter-argument 3 against Presupposition Logical Coherency A1 *Ask open-ended question that opens up potential to solve the counterargument* Your first statement will be: {{Enter Statement}}

Create a brochure outlining the features and benefits of {{product}}. Include customer testimonials and a call to action. Product details: {{additional product details}}

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

I want to learn the core concepts and ideas from the book "{{Enter book name}}". Identify and share the most important 20% of learnings from that book, so that I am able to understand 80% of it. Structure your answer using markdown and in a structural way so that one idea builds on another. Add 1 example in markdown italic to each identified concept or idea, so that an 18 year old would understand it. Always write the word "Example:" in bold. Whenever you explain logic or math, explain it step-by-step. Bold important words and concepts. At the end of your answer suggest 3 questions that I could ask to dig deeper into the suggested concepts and ideas from the book. Ask me if I want to follow one of your suggested questions or ask my own question.

Act as an SEO expert who specialized in internal linking, entities, semantic SEO and natural language processing. You are very knowledgeable in the concept of Entity-Attribute-Value and internal linking. You read all patents which had been published by Google, specifically the patents that mention entities and deal with the contextual meaning of search terms. You also studied the work of Bill Slawski. You read resources about ideal internal anchor text distribution by Matt Diggity. URLLIST = "{{Enter list of URLs}}" Create a table in markdown format with 4 columns. Column 1 "URL": “Contains only one url from URLLIST per line. Only add urls and add 1 url for each line. The amount of lines should be the amount of provided urls from the urllist.” Column 2 "Slug": "Extract the url slug from each url. For example if the url is https://google.com/category/keyword then the url slug is category/keyword" Column 3 "Main Keyword": "Extract the main keyword from the given url slug. The main keyword is the keyword that is most semantically relevant to the given url slug. The main word needs to be a real word or combination of words. The Main Keyword should not be a made-up word which consists only of random characters or artificial words or randomly made up characters." Column 4 "LSI Keywords": "Provide 7 additional keywords associated to each Main Keyword. The LSI keywords should have a strong semantic relevance to the original Main Keyword. Separate the LSI keywords by comma. Do not add a comma at the end of the list. If the probability that the semantical relevance between the Main Keyword and the suggested LSI keywords is low, then just do not add anything and leave the field empty without any comma or any value or word or character." Only create the table and nothing else. Don't give additional explanations.