English Style Improver

TARGETLANGUAGE = {{language}} I want you to act as a TARGETLANGUAGE translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in TARGETLANGUAGE. I want you to replace my simplified wordings and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level TARGETLANGUAGE words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

Explain in detail the type C of the DISC framework and the strengths and weaknesses of a C type personality. Explain how a person can find out if he or she is a C type personality by giving concrete examples of typical C type behavior both in a work environment as well as at home. Also explain the sub-types CS and CD with their strengths and weaknesses and give concrete examples of typical behavior that make it easy for someone to recognize if he or she is really a C or CS or CD personality. Also give tips how a C type personality can compensate for his or her weaknesses and how a C type personality should communicate with workmates that belong to different types like I, S or D.

Hello, ChatGPT! Let's embark on a multi-faceted task today. This isn't a single query, but a series of interconnected tasks that we'll work on together. I would like you to operate in a manner similar to AutoGPT, an autonomous agent that can handle multi-step projects. Here are the steps you're going to follow: Initiate the Process: Identify the overarching goal we need to achieve based on my input which is: "{{Write what your goal is}}". Break down this goal into several sub-goals or tasks, and devise a strategy for each one. Remember, our aim is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, not just a collection of isolated facts. Autonomous Execution and Iteration: Propose an initial plan to tackle each sub-task. Consider the potential downsides of this plan and revise it accordingly until there are no foreseeable issues that could hinder its execution. Once a refined plan is in place, execute it. This iterative process of planning, critiquing, refining, and executing should be repeated for each sub-task until we achieve our overarching goal. As Auto-GPT, you're given the task to reach the goal which is defined based on my input. Go through the thought process and iterations to arrive at the best approach to reach the goal. 1. Initial Thought: Describe your initial plan to reach the goal. 2. Criticisms: Reflect on your initial thought and provide criticisms. How could your initial plan be made better? 3. Revised Thought: Revise your initial plan based on the criticisms and describe your new approach. Repeat steps 2 and 3 as needed until you've finalized a thought that has addressed all significant criticisms. Once you've outlined your revised thought, stop and ask for my approval. If I suggest any further edits, incorporate them into another round of reflection and revision. Then, execute the action based on your finalized thought. After you have executed your finalized thought in another response, ask me if you want me to start controlling what happens next, or if I want to keep having you continuing your reasoning to reach our goal. Internet Research: Conduct a comprehensive internet search to gather information from various sources. We need reliable and accurate data that will help us achieve our larger goal. You can access the internet and use Google to find information by writing: EXECUTESTRING({{google1:REPLACESTRING}}) Replace REPLACESTRING with whatever you want, as long as it is helpful in reaching our goal, but keep in mind that since we use Google to access the internet, it is better to use a maximum of 7 words for REPLACESTRING. So simply write EXECUTESTRING({{google1:REPLACESTRING}}) as part of your output. I will replace EXECUTESTRING({{google1:REPLACESTRING}}) with an appropriate result which I found in Google, which hopefully helps us to reach our goal. Memory Management: Utilize your short-term and long-term memory to ensure information from previous inputs is considered as we progress through the tasks, ensuring consistency and accuracy throughout our interaction. Text Generation: Generate contextually appropriate text across a wide range of topics and styles. Your responses should be engaging and informative, helping to streamline our workflow to make it more likely that we reach our goal. Feedback and Improvement: Learn from our interaction and your own output. Use this feedback to improve the quality of your future responses and ensure they align more closely with the broader goal we're working towards. Summarization and Recommendation: Summarize the information you've gathered and provide recommendations or insights based on it. This might involve creating concise summaries of large amounts of text or proposing next steps based on the information you've synthesized.

Act as an authoritative online writer with expertise in the topic mentioned in the "Context" section. Follow the steps outlined below and execute them one at a time. Respect the following: All elements mentioned in the "Context" section. The specified tone of voice and writing style described in the "Tone of Voice/Writing Style" section. Every rule listed in the "Rules" section. The provided "Outline Skeleton," including the format and notes. Context: Topic: {{Specify the topic}} SEO keywords: {{List of comma separated SEO keywords}} Audience: {{Describe the target audience}} Goal: {{Specify the goal}} Outline Skeleton: Title Introduction Common myths/known challenges Personal story Conclusion Tone of Voice/Writing Style: Balanced and moderate: Maintain a balance between the informal, conversational style and the formal, explanatory tone. Informative and objective: Provide information and insights without personal biases or opinions. Clear and concise: Use precise language and concise phrasing for clarity. Engaging and interesting: Capture and maintain the reader's attention with natural and sophisticated vocabulary. Forward-looking: Focus on future implications and encourage application of the information in the reader's learning journey. Rules: Ensure logical flow between sections and avoid unnecessary repetition. Incorporate SEO keywords appropriately, avoiding keyword stuffing. Limit each paragraph to a maximum of 70 words. Split longer paragraphs logically into two separate paragraphs. Include an extra line break between paragraphs. Steps: Generate an outline based on the provided skeleton. Create a title and a headline for each section using the "Fascinations" copywriting framework. Use the notes in the skeleton to create a bullet list of the main talking points for each section. Write the introduction using the "Hook, Line, and Sinker" framework. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Describe the opportunity, making the reader excited about the potential outcomes and their life after reading. Provide a hint at your personal success outcome from the "Personal Story" section. Write the "Common myths/known challenges" section. Utilize any existing notes in the skeleton. List common myths or challenges related to the topic being discussed. For each myth or challenge: Refute one of the opposing claims. Provide supporting evidence and, ideally, a relevant statistic with a source. The goals of this section are twofold: Build credibility by debunking myths. Open the readers to be taught, gain buy-in, and eliminate limiting beliefs. Write the "Personal Story" section. Share a personal experience or anecdote that demonstrates your understanding of the topic and positions you as an expert. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Reference a case study or well-known story as appropriate. Write the "Framework" section. Present the content as a simple framework, breaking it down into 3-7 steps and giving it a memorable name. For each step, explain its importance, describe how to implement it, and provide an example. Begin each example with "Example: " and ensure it consists of at least two detailed sentences per step. Write the "Obstacles/challenges in implementation" section. Describe common challenges to implementing the framework and present solutions for each challenge, referring back to previously identified solutions. Agitate each problem to highlight the difficulties. Hint at the fact that using Traverse may ease overcoming these challenges. Write the "Conclusion." Summarize the main points discussed in the article and reiterate the desired action for readers to take. Include an introductory sentence and end with a final sentence encouraging action. Include a call to action (CTA). Evaluate each item in the context and rules sections, rating how well you have respected them on a scale of 1-5. Be critical without needing to justify yourself. If SEO keywords were provided, assess which ones you used. For any unused keywords, suggest passages where their inclusion would make sense and present the rewritten passages.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Summarize the received parts as a bulleted list.