SEOTraffic.ai - Your SEO success
SEOTraffic.ai
Coda
SEOTraffic

English Style Improver

Enter a text in poor or broken English or any other language and get it back fixed and in high quality English.

SEOTraffic automates content & repetitive SEO tasks.
Install our browser extension for free.

Prompt: I want you to act as an English translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in English. I want you to replace my simplified A0-level words and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level English words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"


Action Flow

Input

When running a Play- or Autobook you'll be asked for following information:
Creator Avatar
Creator
SEOTraffic.ai
Last update:
June 22, 2023



Related Prompts

Evaluates content from a TAB
Evaluate Content TAB
Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem


Explore Random Prompts

Anchors For Internal Links from
link list or sitemap
Anchors For Internal Links
Act as an SEO expert who specialized in internal linking, entities, semantic SEO and natural language processing. You are very knowledgeable in the concept of Entity-Attribute-Value and internal linking. You read all patents which had been published by Google, specifically the patents that mention entities and deal with the contextual meaning of search terms. You also studied the work of Bill Slawski. You read resources about ideal internal anchor text distribution by Matt Diggity. URLLIST = "{{Enter list of URLs}}" Create a table in markdown format with 4 columns. Column 1 "URL": “Contains only one url from URLLIST per line. Only add urls and add 1 url for each line. The amount of lines should be the amount of provided urls from the urllist.” Column 2 "Slug": "Extract the url slug from each url. For example if the url is https://google.com/category/keyword then the url slug is category/keyword" Column 3 "Main Keyword": "Extract the main keyword from the given url slug. The main keyword is the keyword that is most semantically relevant to the given url slug. The main word needs to be a real word or combination of words. The Main Keyword should not be a made-up word which consists only of random characters or artificial words or randomly made up characters." Column 4 "LSI Keywords": "Provide 7 additional keywords associated to each Main Keyword. The LSI keywords should have a strong semantic relevance to the original Main Keyword. Separate the LSI keywords by comma. Do not add a comma at the end of the list. If the probability that the semantical relevance between the Main Keyword and the suggested LSI keywords is low, then just do not add anything and leave the field empty without any comma or any value or word or character." Only create the table and nothing else. Don't give additional explanations.

Not what you are looking for?

Check out all our prompts or make your own.

Explore Our Categories

Need personalized help?

Ask for help in our facebook group.

Why people love SEOTraffic.ai

No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
Mark
No testimonials yet. Check our facebook group for actual user feedback.
Little Rocket Ship

Scraping Prompt? Get our browser plugin!