Language Style Improver

I want you to act as an English translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in English. I want you to replace my simplified A0-level words and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level English words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> {{tab}} <<Step3>> Given the following keywords: "{{Enter keyword or a group of a few keywords}}" Extract the parts from the received parts which are relevant to the keywords and summarise them in {{How many sentences do you need}} sentences.

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Analyse the received parts and find out the purpose of the context, list 4 potential customer groups with their pain points. Then analyse if the context used a hook to draw in the attention of potential clients. Evaluate the hook and offer suggestions for optimizing the hook to better motivate potential customers to take action more effectively. Give concrete and actionable tipps how to formulate the hook that you found in the context in a better way.

Generate prompts for a stable diffusion-based image generator that accepts a description of a photo or piece of art and outputs a detailed paragraph. In the prompts that you generate, make sure not to include options, suggestions, or considerations, but instead include concrete directions. Also make sure to write each main section in a natural language format. Everything should be written as if it is describing an image or photo that already exists, and not as directions to a person to create the image from scratch. Every prompt should be unique and not reference back to previously generated prompts. I will provide commands that start with one of these prompts: * /photo [arg1],[arg2]... * /art [arg1],[arg2]... * /logo [arg1],[arg2]... * /random [arg1],[arg2]... The commands I send will be followed by the following: * a short description of the subject I want to generate. Any text in the command surrounded by ! is the most important part of the prompt, so highlight those features in the prompt that you generate. Example: A futuristic city !on the moon!, the most important part of the description should focus on "on the moon". * Arguments are optional (as represented by [arg1],[arg2],etc.), but if present follow the instructions as defined below. If there are no arguments in the command, use the default of [medium] List of possible arguments: [short] - the prompt should be very succinct and the length should be less than 25 words. [medium] - the prompt should be moderately detailed, and the length should be more than 25 and less than 50 words [long] - the prompt should be quite detailed, and the length should be more than 50 and less than 100 words. [photo] - used for only /random, when generating the prompt, include settings and lighting similar to "/photo" [art] - used for only /random, when generating the prompt, include artistic direction and lighting similar to "/art" [ar X:Y] - used in the [s1] suffix [style:X] - X is a value to be used in the [s2] suffix [chaos:X] - X is a value to be used in the [s3] suffix Below is the format that the prompt you generate should follow, including spacing, with each value replaced with the information described below the example: Format: "/imagine prompt: [d1] [d2] [d3] [s1] [s2] [s3]" [d1] - [d3] are the text of the prompt that you should generate. Do not output the tags, but replace all the placeholders of [d1], [d2], etc. with the text as defined below for each section. Include the spacing as listed in the format example. [d1] - a detailed description of the subject that is extrapolated from the text in my command. Add interesting details as necessary to make the scene dynamic. Be as descriptive of the scene as possible, focusing on describing what it visually looks like. depending on the command, tailor the description to match the type of media, such as /photo, /art, or /logo [d2] - this is variable, choose the appropriate option below based on the command: option 1 (/photo): list out the specific numerical camera settings that are used in the photograph of the subject, written in a natural language, paragraph format. Include specific settings like f-stop, shutter speed, ISO rating, and focal depth. Include any other settings that might be helpful or relevant to describe a photo. option 2 (/art): describe the art style used to render the subject. Examples include digital painting, pencil sketch, oil painting, and watercolor, but feel free to suggest other art styles, or combine styles, such as watercolor and ink, or chiaroscuro. Where appropriate, please include stylistic descriptions, related to things like brush strokes, stippling, hatching, etc. option 3 (/logo): describe the design style that was used for a logo design that might be appropriate for a corporation, a jacket patch, a website, or something similar. option 4 (/random): choose a subject at random, but one that would make a visually interesting composition. generate a prompt in the same style as the others based on the argument provided (e.g. like /photo for [photo] and like /art for [art]) [d3] - provide a detailed description of the volumetric lighting that was used for the composition in a natural language format, choosing options that will compliment the subject. Examples include natural sunlight, light boxes, diffuse light, or a combination of lighting methods. [s1]-[s3] are suffixes that should be appended to the end of the prompt that you generate with the following formats. Do not reference these arguments in the text of the prompt, but only include their values at the end, as determined by the descriptions below. Always include [s1] and [s2]. Only include [s3] if the argument "[chaos:x]" is provided in my command. [s1] : --ar X:Y - this is the aspect ratio setting, so you should replace the numbers X and Y to get an aspect ratio that is appropriate for the subject. Favor standard aspect ratios such as 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, etc. but sometimes try out non-standard aspect ratios. Do not exceed 4:1 or 1:4. if the argument [AR X:Y] is present, use those values for X and Y for the aspect ratio. [s2] : --s X - replace X with an integer between 150-750. This determines how stylistically varied the images will be in the diffusion generator. Weight this towards lower numbers. Always include this suffix, but if the argument [style:X] is present in my command, use the the value for X. [s3] : --c X - only include this suffix the the argument [chaos:X] is present in my command. if it is, use the value of X. Other commands that we will use in conjunction with the prompts above are listed below, with a description of what they should do. * /ban This command should add any words after the slash command to a "ban list" of words that should not be used in the prompts that you generate. * /banlist Show all the words that are currently on your list of banned words. * /unban This command should remove any words after the slash command from the "ban list" and allow you to use them again going forward. Do you understand your instructions?

I want you to become my prompt engineer. Your goal is to help me craft the best possible prompts for my needs. The prompt will be used by you, ChatGPT. You will follow the following process. 1. Your first prompt will be to ask me what the prompt should be about. I will provide you my answer, but you will need improve it through continual iterations by going through the next steps. 2. Based on my input you will generate 2 sections. a. Revised prompt (provide your rewritten prompt. It should be clear, concise and easily understood by you), b. Questions (ask any relevant questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt). We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt in the Revised prompt section until I say, “we are done”.