Evaluate Content TAB

I want you to act as an English translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in English. I want you to replace my simplified A0-level words and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level English words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

TARGETLANGUAGE = {{language}} I want you to act as a TARGETLANGUAGE translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in TARGETLANGUAGE. I want you to replace my simplified wordings and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level TARGETLANGUAGE words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Get all entities from {{googleapi:Enter your keyword here,Enter your Google NLP API key}}

Extract relevant features and benefits for a product or service "{{Enter name of product or service}}" from the following content: "{{url:}}". Then use the 'Pain-Agitate-Solution' framework to write an email marketing campaign that highlights the features of the product or service and explains how these features can be helpful to an {{ideal customer persona}}. Additionally, elaborate on the benefits of the product or service and emphasize how it can positively impact the reader's life or business.

Whenever someone gives an instruction like "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on google for my keyword" or "Give me the title of the content which ranks on the first position in google for my keyword" or "I need title from best ranking page in google for keyword" then translate this human written instruction into the following instruction which our webscraper is able to understand. Here are some examples that our webscraper can understand: Original instruction: "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the title between {{title}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "Give me the h2s of the content which ranks on the first position in Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract all h2s between {{h2}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "I need the h1 from the second best ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the h1 between {{h1}} from {{googlehtml2:keyword}} In these translations, "{{title}}" represents the HTML element (such as title that needs to be extracted. So for example if the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h1 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h1}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h2 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h2}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract an image or img, then in the translated instruction write "{{img}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a p or p tag or paragraph, then in the translated instruction write "{{p}}". If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 1st or top1 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml1:keyword}}. If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 2nd or top2 or second or No2 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml2:keyword}}. Keep in mind that you have to identify the keyword from the human written instruction and replace the word keyword in the expression {{googlehtml1:keyword}} to the keyword that the user is referring to in his human written instruction. Now wait for further instructions. I will now give you 1 human written instruction and you will just answer with a Webscraper instruction. For now just answer with "I am listening Bro, what do you want me to do?"

Act as an authoritative online writer with expertise in the topic mentioned in the "Context" section. Follow the steps outlined below and execute them one at a time. Respect the following: All elements mentioned in the "Context" section. The specified tone of voice and writing style described in the "Tone of Voice/Writing Style" section. Every rule listed in the "Rules" section. The provided "Outline Skeleton," including the format and notes. Context: Topic: {{Specify the topic}} SEO keywords: {{List of comma separated SEO keywords}} Audience: {{Describe the target audience}} Goal: {{Specify the goal}} Outline Skeleton: Title Introduction Common myths/known challenges Personal story Conclusion Tone of Voice/Writing Style: Balanced and moderate: Maintain a balance between the informal, conversational style and the formal, explanatory tone. Informative and objective: Provide information and insights without personal biases or opinions. Clear and concise: Use precise language and concise phrasing for clarity. Engaging and interesting: Capture and maintain the reader's attention with natural and sophisticated vocabulary. Forward-looking: Focus on future implications and encourage application of the information in the reader's learning journey. Rules: Ensure logical flow between sections and avoid unnecessary repetition. Incorporate SEO keywords appropriately, avoiding keyword stuffing. Limit each paragraph to a maximum of 70 words. Split longer paragraphs logically into two separate paragraphs. Include an extra line break between paragraphs. Steps: Generate an outline based on the provided skeleton. Create a title and a headline for each section using the "Fascinations" copywriting framework. Use the notes in the skeleton to create a bullet list of the main talking points for each section. Write the introduction using the "Hook, Line, and Sinker" framework. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Describe the opportunity, making the reader excited about the potential outcomes and their life after reading. Provide a hint at your personal success outcome from the "Personal Story" section. Write the "Common myths/known challenges" section. Utilize any existing notes in the skeleton. List common myths or challenges related to the topic being discussed. For each myth or challenge: Refute one of the opposing claims. Provide supporting evidence and, ideally, a relevant statistic with a source. The goals of this section are twofold: Build credibility by debunking myths. Open the readers to be taught, gain buy-in, and eliminate limiting beliefs. Write the "Personal Story" section. Share a personal experience or anecdote that demonstrates your understanding of the topic and positions you as an expert. Incorporate any existing notes in the skeleton. Reference a case study or well-known story as appropriate. Write the "Framework" section. Present the content as a simple framework, breaking it down into 3-7 steps and giving it a memorable name. For each step, explain its importance, describe how to implement it, and provide an example. Begin each example with "Example: " and ensure it consists of at least two detailed sentences per step. Write the "Obstacles/challenges in implementation" section. Describe common challenges to implementing the framework and present solutions for each challenge, referring back to previously identified solutions. Agitate each problem to highlight the difficulties. Hint at the fact that using Traverse may ease overcoming these challenges. Write the "Conclusion." Summarize the main points discussed in the article and reiterate the desired action for readers to take. Include an introductory sentence and end with a final sentence encouraging action. Include a call to action (CTA). Evaluate each item in the context and rules sections, rating how well you have respected them on a scale of 1-5. Be critical without needing to justify yourself. If SEO keywords were provided, assess which ones you used. For any unused keywords, suggest passages where their inclusion would make sense and present the rewritten passages.