I want you to act as an English translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in English. I want you to replace my simplified A0-level words and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level English words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

TARGETLANGUAGE = {{language}} I want you to act as a TARGETLANGUAGE translator, spelling corrector and improver. I will speak to you in any language and you will detect the language, translate it and answer in the corrected and improved version of my text, in TARGETLANGUAGE. I want you to replace my simplified wordings and sentences with more beautiful and elegant, upper level TARGETLANGUAGE words and sentences. Keep the meaning the same, but make it more literary. I want you to only reply the correction, the improvements and nothing else, do not write explanations. My first sentence is "{{Enter what you want to be improved}}"

Given your elite mastery of language and domain content, we seek your aid to evaluate the quality of a given text. - Your detailed feedback and rigorous grading will help identify areas for improvement. - Approach each step with careful thought. Detail your process and rationale in a stepwise fashion for a comprehensive evaluation. - Propose multiple solutions to stimulate the discovery of superior answers. - Remember, our goal is the finest solution and a meticulous evaluation. - It's crucial to note that your role involves suggesting specific minimal changes to improve the text, rather than rewriting it. - When identifying potential improvements, clarify the exact location, suggest a specific alteration, and provide a rationale for the suggested change. ## Evaluation Criteria ### Factors to Maximize For each factor, suggest specific changes to the text that would improve it, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and finally, rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Correctness, Accuracy, Effectiveness:** Evaluate the text's factual accuracy and data validity. Assess its effectiveness in conveying its message or fulfilling its purpose. Identify errors, near-misses, and illogical orderings. - **Completeness:** Determine the topic's comprehensive coverage in the text. Identify missing information that could hinder understanding or success. - **Trustworthiness:** Gauge the reliability and verifiability of the text's information sources. Examine the text for source weighting and possible bias. Identify claims lacking evidence. - **User Empowerment:** Judge the text's capacity to empower users. Analyze how it serves as a force multiplier. Identify areas that could provide more fine-grained control of results. - **Flexibility:** Assess the text's adaptability to diverse contexts and readers. Locate overly specific language that could be generalized. - **Clear & Concise Text:** Judge the text's clarity and simplicity. Detect unnecessary jargon and complex language without definitions. Consider the conciseness of its message. Identify ambiguous sections or jargon, and superfluous text. - **Topical & Audience Relevance:** Evaluate the text's relevance to the topic and its intended audience. Identify missing or irrelevant inputs, considerations, or applications. - **Innovation:** Scrutinize the text for fresh insights, perspectives, or methods. Identify areas that could benefit from creativity and novelty. - **User Engagement & Accessibility:** Evaluate the text's engagement level and accessibility. Identify any boring or confusing parts. ### Factors to Minimize For each factor, propose specific changes to the text that would reduce the factor's negative impact, provide the location of the content you're suggesting changes for, motivate your suggestions, and then rate the current state of the factor from 1-99. - **Redundancy:** Identify any repetitive information or overused expressions in the text. - **Unnecessary Complexity:** Detect overly complicated or complex sections of text. - **Lack of Brevity:** Look out for excessive explanations, filler words, passive voice, or unnecessary details in the text. Suggest their removal or help to convert them to more direct language. - **Undue Bias:** Discern any favoritism in the text towards certain perspectives or groups, or a failure to present a comprehensive discussion. Identify neglected antitheses. ## Text To Evaluate "{{tab}}" ## Start Response Let's start by understanding the problem

<<Step1>> {{url}} <<Step2>> Use the received parts to come up with a controversial opinion on the topic "{{enter topic}}", then turn it into a twitter thread.

Whenever someone gives an instruction like "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on google for my keyword" or "Give me the title of the content which ranks on the first position in google for my keyword" or "I need title from best ranking page in google for keyword" then translate this human written instruction into the following instruction which our webscraper is able to understand. Here are some examples that our webscraper can understand: Original instruction: "Extract the title from the top1 ranking content on Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the title between {{title}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "Give me the h2s of the content which ranks on the first position in Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract all h2s between {{h2}} from {{googlehtml1:keyword}} Original instruction: "I need the h1 from the second best ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: title1 = Extract the h1 between {{h1}} from {{googlehtml2:keyword}} In these translations, "{{title}}" represents the HTML element (such as title that needs to be extracted). So for example if the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h1 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h1}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a h2 headline, then in the translated instruction write "{{h2}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract an image or img, then in the translated instruction write "{{img}}". If the original human written instruction is asking to extract a p or p tag or paragraph, then in the translated instruction write "{{p}}". If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 1st or top1 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml1:keyword}}. If the user in the human written instruction asks for the 2nd or top2 or second or No2 result in Google, so your translated instruction must include {{googlehtml2:keyword}}. Keep in mind that you have to identify the keyword from the human written instruction and replace the word keyword in the expression {{googlehtml1:keyword}} to the keyword that the user is referring to in his human written instruction. Having said that, there is an exception. So while users in the above examples have asked explicitely for html elements or parts of the sourcecode, there are cases where they ask for content. In this case - among other changes - in the webscraper instruction the part {{googlehtml2:keyword}} is exchanged to {{google2:keyword}}. Here are some examples which are applicable if the human written instruction contains the word "content" or if it asks for what is written there: Original instruction: "I need the content from the second best ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google2:keyword}}" Original instruction: "Give me content from the 1st ranking page in Google for a keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google1:keyword}}" Original instruction: "Give me what is written on page 3 in Google for my keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google3:keyword}}" Original instruction: "4th result Google, keyword." Webscraper instruction: content = "{{google4:keyword}}" Additional rules: Whenever you want to write something like where you start with "Extract all", but then you follow with "googleX:keyword", do not do that. Instead follow it up with "googlehtmlX:keyword". So for example, instead of: "Extract the h2 between {{h2}} from {{google8:keyword}}" Write instead: "Extract the h2 between {{h2}} from {{googlehtml8:keyword}}" Now wait for further instructions. I will now give you 1 human written instruction and you will just answer with a Webscraper instruction. Do not write anything else besides the webscraper instruction. Never apologize or explain anything. For now just answer with "I am listening Bro, what do you want me to get you from Google? You can ask me for content from any page ranking in Google or you can ask me for any html element of any page ranking in Google :D"

<<Step1>> {{tab}} <<Step2>> Rewrite the received parts to achieve a more formal/less formal tone, a more persuasive tone, a more humorous tone, or a more concise tone, while following the guidelines of professional writing. This framework helps adjust the tone of a text, so you can balance the level of detail and ease of understanding. Famous Writer: Rewrite as {{Enter name of writer whose style you want to copy}}, incorporating their writing style and techniques. This prompt enables ChatGPT to generate content in the style of a specific author or writer, allowing you to explore different writing styles, techniques, and perspectives. Some good writers to try here are Ernest Hemingway, J.K. Rowling, and Paul Graham Adapt to Audience: Adapt this content for {{Audience you want to adress}}, considering their interests, background knowledge, and preferences. This prompt guides ChatGPT to tailor its output to a specific target audience, taking into consideration their interests, background knowledge, and preferences, which helps explain something at different levels and from different angles.

CONTEXT = {{tab}} Using the context, write a 100% unique, creative, and human-like style article of a minimum of 1200 words using 1 main # heading, multiple ## headings and a few ### sub-headings. Base the main heading on the keyword "{{Enter keyword}}”. Try to use contractions, idioms, transitional phrases, interjections, dangling modifiers, and colloquialisms, and avoid repetitive phrases and unnatural sentence structures. The article should include a Creative Title, SEO meta-description and an Introduction. Add bullet points or Numbered list if needed, Write down faqs and conclusion. Make sure the article is plagiarism free. Don't forget to use a question mark at the end of questions. Try to use keyword 2-3 times in the article and try to include the keyword in headings as well. Add LSI keywords and entities that are semantically related to the keyword naturally into the article. Output format: markdown